The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blends of Poly-(ε-caprolactone) and Polysaccharides in Tissue Engineering Applications
Abstract
Bioartificial blends of poly-(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) with a polysaccharide (starch, S; dextran, D; or gellan, G) (PCL/S, PCL/D, PCL/G 90.9/9.1 wt ratio) were prepared by a solution-precipitation technique and widely characterized by differential scanning calorimetry analysis (DSC), Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR), optical microscopy (OM), wide-angle X-ray diffraction analysis (WAXD), and thermogravimetry (TGA). DSC showed that the polysaccharide reduced the crystallinity of PCL and had a nucleation effect, which was also confirmed by OM analysis. Hoffman-Weeks analysis was performed on PCL and blend samples allowing calculation of their equilibrium melting temperatures (). WAXD showed that the crystalline unit cell type was the same for PCL and blends. FTIR-ATR did not evidence interactions between blend components. Thermal stability was affected by the type of polysaccharide. Microparticles (<125 microm) were produced from blends by cryogenical milling and characterized by scanning electron microscopy analysis (SEM). Selective laser sintering (SLS), a new rapid prototyping technology for scaffold fabrication, was applied to sinter blend microparticles according to a PC-designed two-dimensional geometry (strips and 2 x 2 mm(2) square-meshed grids). The optimal experimental conditions for sintering were established and laser beam parameters (beam speed, BS, and power, P) were found for each blend composition. Morphology of sintered objects was analyzed by SEM and found to be dependent on the morphology of the sintered powders. Sintered samples were analyzed by chemical imaging (CI), FTIR-ATR, DSC, and contact angle analysis. No evidence of the occurrence of degradation phenomena was found by FTIR-ATR for sintered samples, whereas DSC parameters of PCL and blends showed changes which could be attributed to some molecular weight decrease of PCL during sintering. CI of sintered samples showed that the polysaccharide phase was homogeneously dispersed within the PCL matrix, with the only exception being the PCL/D blend. The contact angle analysis showed that all samples were hydrophilic. Fibroblasts were then seeded on scaffolds to evaluate the rate and the extent of cell adhesion and the effect of the polysaccharides (S, D, G) on the bioactivity of the PCL-based blends.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Langer, R., & Vacanti, J. P. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8493529 · Cited by 9,893
Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage
Hutmacher, D. W. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6 · Cited by 4,994
Phillips, G. O., & Williams, P. A. (2009) · Woodhead Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781845695873 · Cited by 2,105
Principles of Tissue Engineering
(2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2011-0-07193-4 · Cited by 1,906
The Basic Science of Gene Therapy
Mulligan, R. C. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8493530 · Cited by 1,741
Hutmacher, D. W., Schantz, T., Zein, I., Ng, K. W., Teoh, S. H., & Tan, K. C. (2001) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::aid-jbm1007>3.0.co;2-7 · Cited by 1,409
Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering
Agrawal, C. M., & Ray, R. B. (2001) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<141::aid-jbm1000>3.0.co;2-j · Cited by 1,052
Glycosaminoglycans and Their Binding to Biological Macromolecules
Lindahl, U., & Hook, M. (1978) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.47.070178.002125 · Cited by 840
Biodegradable polymers as drug delivery systems
(1992) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology · doi:10.1016/0300-9629(92)90663-b · Cited by 779
Biodegradable polymers as drug delivery systems
(1991) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0223-5234(91)90162-g · Cited by 514
Cited by
Polymeric Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Application: A Review
Dhandayuthapani, B., Yoshida, Y., Maekawa, T., & Kumar, D. S. (2011) · International Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1155/2011/290602 · Cited by 1,773
A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
Reddy, M. S. B., Ponnamma, D., Choudhary, R., & Sadasivuni, K. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13071105 · Cited by 1,104
(2018) · PubMed Central · Cited by 365
Hajiali, F., Tajbakhsh, S., & Shojaei, A. (2018) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2017.1332640 · Cited by 267
Materials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
Ciardelli, G., & Chiono, V. (2006) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.200500151 · Cited by 255
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ciardelli, G., Chiono, V., Vozzi, G., Pracella, M., Ahluwalia, A., Barbani, N., Cristallini, C., & Giusti, P.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-04-27
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1961-1976
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W1999940864
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 6.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blends of Poly-(ε-caprolactone) and Polysaccharides in Tissue Engineering Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm0500805
- The paper
- Ciardelli, G., Chiono, V., Vozzi, G., Pracella, M., Ahluwalia, A., Barbani, N., Cristallini, C., & Giusti, P. (2005). Blends of Poly-(ε-caprolactone) and Polysaccharides in Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0500805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.