Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,091

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrogels for Protein Delivery

Vermonden, Tina, Censi, Roberta, Hennink, Wim E.·2012·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

This review describes injectable polymeric delivery systemsused for the controlled release of pharmaceutical proteins, withspecial focus on hydrogels. We shortly overview the currentlyavailable technologies other than hydrogels, which includelipid-based delivery systems, nano/microparticles based ondegradable hydrophobic polymers, highlighting their rationale,characteristics, and shortcomings in protein delivery. In thisreview, hydrogels are extensively described, from their generalfeatures to recent advances in synthesis and pharmaceutical andclinical applications. The discussion covers injectable systemsbased on nano- and particularly microparticles as well asphysical and chemical cross-linking methods used for in situgelling systems and environmentally responsive hydrogels andtheir use for protein release. Some limitations of hydrogels inprotein delivery (e.g., burst and incomplete release, proteindamage due to encapsulation) are also discussed and ways totackle these are provided. Emerging techniques to study releasefrom hydrogels are illustrated and current applied hydrogelsystems are discussed. Finally, hydrogel/protein formulationsthat have reached clinical trials are summarized and discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr200157d

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,091

Metadata

Authors
Vermonden, T., Censi, R., & Hennink, W. E.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2012-02-23
Volume
112
Issue
5
Pages
2853-2888
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2032306620
Cited by
1,091
References
14
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.