Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Study of CO2 Capture by Carbon Nanotubes, Activated Carbons, and Zeolites

Lu, Chungsying, Bai, Hsunling, Wu, Bilen, Su, Fengsheng, Hwang, Jyh Feng·2008·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), granular activated carbon (GAC), and zeolites were modified by 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APTS) and were selected as adsorbents to study their physicochemical properties and adsorption behaviors of CO 2 from gas streams. The surface nature of these adsorbents was changed after the modification, which make them adsorb more CO 2 gases. Under the same conditions, the modified CNTs possess the greatest adsorption capacity of CO 2, followed by the modified zeolites and then the modified GAC. The mechanism of CO 2 adsorption on these adsorbents appears mainly attributable to physical force, which makes regeneration of spent adsorbents at a relatively low temperature become feasible. The APTS-modified CNTs show good performance of CO 2 adsorption as compared to many types of modified carbon and silica adsorbents reported in the literature. This suggests that the APTS-modified CNTs are efficient CO 2 adsorbents and that they possess potential applications for CO 2 capture from gas streams.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef8000086

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lu, C., Bai, H., Wu, B., Su, F., & Hwang, J. F.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2008-07-25
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
3050-3056
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2089126807
Cited by
422
References
21
FWCI
28.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.