Cited by 45Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Temporal trends of perfluorooctanesulfonate isomer and enantiomer patterns in archived Swedish and American serum samples

Liu, Yanna, Pereira, Alberto S., Beesoon, Sanjay, Vestergren, Robin, Berger, Urs, Olsen, Geary W., Glynn, Anders, Martin, Jonathan W.·2015·Environment International

Abstract

Human perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) body burdens are attributable to both direct PFOS and indirect PFOS precursor (PreFOS) exposure. The relative importance of these two pathways has been estimated, but the relative temporal trajectory of exposure to PFOS and PreFOS has not been examined. Here, two hypothesized biomarkers of PreFOS exposure, PFOS isomer profiles (quantified as percent branched PFOS, %br-PFOS) and chiral 1m-PFOS enantiomer fractions (1m-PFOS EF) were analyzed in archived human serum samples of individual American adults (1974-2010) and pooled samples of Swedish primiparous women (1996-2010). After correcting for potential confounders, significant correlations between %br-PFOS and 1m-PFOS EFs were observed in American samples and in Swedish samples for the 1996-2000 period, supporting the hypothesis that both %br-PFOS and 1m-PFOS EF are biomarkers of PreFOS exposure. Significant trends of increasing %br-PFOS, from 2000 to 2010, and increasingly non-racemic 1m-PFOS EFs, from 1996 to 2000, were detected in Swedish samples. No statistically significant trend for %br-PFOS or 1m-PFOS EF was observed in American samples, but American males had significantly higher %br-PFOS and significantly lower 1m-PFOS EF (i.e. more non-racemic) than females, and a similar significant difference was shown in the older age group, relative to the younger age group. These temporal trends in %br-PFOS and 1m-PFOS EF are not easily explained and the results highlight uncertainties about how humans are exposed to PFOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.014

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Pereira, A. S., Beesoon, S., Vestergren, R., Berger, U., Olsen, G. W., Glynn, A., & Martin, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • NILU (NO)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • 3M (United States) (US)
  • National Food Administration (SE)
Corresponding author
Martin, Jonathan W.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
75
Pages
215-222
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977883339
Cited by
45
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NSERC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
PFOS, PFOS isomers, temporal trends, human serum, biomarkers, sex differences, age differences, primiparous women, exposure pathways
MeSH terms
Adult, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Isomerism, Male, Middle Aged, Sweden, United States, Alkanesulfonic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review