Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selectivity Control of Cu Nanocrystals in a Gas-Fed Flow Cell through CO2 Pulsed Electroreduction

Open access
Jeon, Hyo Sang, Timoshenko, Janis, Rettenmaier, Clara, Herzog, Antonia, Yoon, Aram, Chee, See Wee, Oener, Sebastian, Hejral, Uta, Haase, Felix T., Roldan Cuenya, Beatriz·2021·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

In this study, we have taken advantage of a pulsed CO2 electroreduction reaction (CO2RR) approach to tune the product distribution at industrially-relevant current densities in a gas-fed flow cell.We compared the CO2RR selectivity of Cu catalysts subjected to either potentiostatic conditions (fixed applied potential of -0.7 VRHE) or pulsed electrolysis conditions (1 s pulses at oxidative potentials ranging from Ean = 0.6 VRHE to 1.5 VRHE, followed by 1 s pulses at -0.7 VRHE), and identified the main parameters responsible for the enhanced product selectivity observed in the latter case.Herein, two distinct regimes were observed: (i) for Ean = 0.9 VRHE we obtained 10 % enhanced C2 product selectivity (F.E.C2H4 = 43.6% and F.E.C2H5OH = 19.8%)as compared to potentiostatic CO2RR at -0.7 VRHE (F.E.C2H4 = 40.9%and F.E.C2H5OH = 11%), while (ii) for Ean =1.2 VRHE, high CH4 selectivity (F.E.CH4 = 48.3% vs. 0.1% at constant -0.7 VRHE) was observed.Operando spectroscopy (XAS, SERS) and ex-situ microscopy (SEM and TEM) measurements revealed that these differences in catalyst selectivity can be assigned to structural modifications and local pH effects.The morphological reconstruction of the catalyst observed after pulsed electrolysis with Ean = 0.9 VRHE, including the presence of highly defective interfaces and grain boundaries was found to play a key role in the enhancement of the C2 product formation.In turn, pulsed electrolysis with Ean = 1.2 VRHE caused the consumption of OH -species near the catalysts surface, leading to an OH-poor environment favorable for CH4 production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.1c03443

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Jeon, H. S., Timoshenko, J., Rettenmaier, C., Herzog, A., Yoon, A., Chee, S. W., Oener, S., Hejral, U., Haase, F. T., & Roldan Cuenya, B.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2021-05-06
Volume
143
Issue
19
Pages
7578-7587
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W3157116955
Cited by
247
References
8
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selectivity Control of Cu Nanocrystals in a Gas-Fed Flow Cell through CO2 Pulsed Electroreduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.1c03443
The paper
Jeon, H. S., Timoshenko, J., Rettenmaier, C., Herzog, A., Yoon, A., Chee, S. W., Oener, S., Hejral, U., Haase, F. T., & Roldan Cuenya, B. (2021). Selectivity Control of Cu Nanocrystals in a Gas-Fed Flow Cell through CO2 Pulsed Electroreduction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c03443

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.