Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 856

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Hydrocarbons Using Bimetallic Cu–Pd Catalysts with Different Mixing Patterns

Open access
Ma, Sichao, Sadakiyo, Masaaki, Heima, Minako, Luo, Raymond, Haasch, Richard T., Gold, Jake I., Yamauchi, Miho, Kenis, Paul J. A.·2017·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Electrochemical conversion of CO 2 holds promise for utilization of CO 2 as a carbon feedstock and for storage of intermittent renewable energy. Presently Cu is the only metallic electrocatalyst known to reduce CO 2 to appreciable amounts of hydrocarbons, but often a wide range of products such as CO, HCOO –, and H 2 are formed as well. Better catalysts that exhibit high activity and especially high selectivity for specific products are needed. Here a range of bimetallic Cu–Pd catalysts with ordered, disordered, and phase-separated atomic arrangements (Cu at:Pd at = 1:1), as well as two additional disordered arrangements (Cu3Pd and CuPd3 with Cu at:Pd at = 3:1 and 1:3), are studied to determine key factors needed to achieve high selectivity for C1 or C2 chemicals in CO 2 reduction. When compared with the disordered and phase-separated CuPd catalysts, the ordered CuPd catalyst exhibits the highest selectivity for C1 products (>80%). The phase-separated CuPd and Cu3Pd achieve higher selectivity (>60%) for C2 chemicals than CuPd3 and ordered CuPd, which suggests that the probability of dimerization of C1 intermediates is higher on surfaces with neighboring Cu atoms. Based on surface valence band spectra, geometric effects rather than electronic effects seem to be key in determining the selectivity of bimetallic Cu–Pd catalysts. These results imply that selectivities to different products can be tuned by geometric arrangements. This insight may benefit the design of catalytic surfaces that further improve activity and selectivity for CO 2 reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.6b10740

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 856

Metadata

Authors
Ma, S., Sadakiyo, M., Heima, M., Luo, R., Haasch, R. T., Gold, J. I., Yamauchi, M., & Kenis, P. J. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2016-12-27
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
47-50
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2561854106
Cited by
856
References
9
FWCI
16.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Hydrocarbons Using Bimetallic Cu–Pd Catalysts with Different Mixing Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b10740
The paper
Ma, S., Sadakiyo, M., Heima, M., Luo, R., Haasch, R. T., Gold, J. I., Yamauchi, M., & Kenis, P. J. A. (2017). Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Hydrocarbons Using Bimetallic Cu–Pd Catalysts with Different Mixing Patterns. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b10740

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.