Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,079

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antioxidant Capacity of 26 Spice Extracts and Characterization of Their Phenolic Constituents

Shan, Bin, Cai, Yizhong Z., Sun, Mei, Corke, Harold·2005·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
DOI 10.1021/jf051513y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Total equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) and phenolic content of 26 common spice extracts from 12 botanical families were investigated. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of major phenolics in the spice extracts were systematically conducted by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). Many spices contained high levels of phenolics and demonstrated high antioxidant capacity. Wide variation in TEAC values (0.55-168.7 mmol/100 g) and total phenolic content (0.04-14.38 g of gallic acid equivalent/100 g) was observed. A highly positive linear relationship (R2= 0.95) obtained between TEAC values and total phenolic content showed that phenolic compounds in the tested spices contributed significantly to their antioxidant capacity. Major types of phenolic constituents identified in the spice extracts were phenolic acids, phenolic diterpenes, flavonoids, and volatile oils (e.g., aromatic compounds). Rosmarinic acid was the dominant phenolic compound in the six spices of the family Labiatae. Phenolic volatile oils were the principal active ingredients in most spices. The spices and related families with the highest antioxidant capacity were screened, e.g., clove in the Myrtaceae, cinnamon in the Lauraceae, oregano in the Labiatae, etc., representing potential sources of potent natural antioxidants for commercial exploitation. This study provides direct comparative data on antioxidant capacity and total and individual phenolics contents of the 26 spice extr…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf051513y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Srinivasan K, 2005, Food Rev. Int., 21, 188, 10.1081/FRI-200051872 · DOI
  2. Kumar N., 1997, Plantation Crops, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
  3. Pizzale L., 2002, J. Sci. Food Agric., 82, 1651, 10.1002/jsfa.1240 · DOI
  4. Dorman H. J. D., 2000, J. Appl. Microbiol., 88, 316
  5. Sokovic M., 2002, Nahrung, 46, 320, 10.1002/1521-3803(20020901)46:5<317::AID-FOOD317>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  6. Aruoma O. I., 1996, Food Chem. Toxicol., 34, 456, 10.1016/0278-6915(96)00004-X · DOI
  7. Lampe J. W, 2003, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 78, 583S, 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.579S · DOI
  8. Zheng W., 2001, J. Agric. Food Chem., 49, 5170, 10.1021/jf010697n · DOI
  9. Velioglu Y. S., 1998, J. Agric. Food Chem., 46, 4117, 10.1021/jf9801973 · DOI
  10. Shobana S., 2000, Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids, 62, 110, 10.1054/plef.1999.0128 · DOI
  11. Madsen H. L., 1995, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 6, 277, 10.1016/S0924-2244(00)89113-X · DOI
  12. Rice-Evans C. A., 1997, Trends Plant Sci., 2, 159
  13. Rice-Evans C. A., 1995, Free Radical Res., 22, 383
  14. Luiz M., 2002, Redox Rep., 7, 28, 10.1179/135100002125000145 · DOI
  15. Chen X. Y., 1998, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 75, 1721
  16. Cos P., 1998, J. Nat. Prod., 61, 76
  17. Laughton M. J., 1991, Biochem. Pharmacol., 42, 1681, 10.1016/0006-2952(91)90501-U · DOI
  18. Yanishlieva N. V., 2001, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 103, 767, 10.1002/1438-9312(200111)103:11<752::AID-EJLT752>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  19. Badei A. Z. M., 2002, Dtsch. Lebensm.-Rundsch., 98, 183
  20. Cuvelier M. E., 1994, J. Agric. Food Chem., 42, 669, 10.1021/jf00039a012 · DOI
  21. Melo E. D., 2005, Lebensm.-Wiss. Technol.-Food Sci. Technol., 38, 19
  22. Gulcin I., 2004, Food Chem., 87, 400, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.12.008 · DOI
  23. Aruoma O. I., 1992, Xenobiotica, 22, 268, 10.3109/00498259209046624 · DOI
  24. Frankel E. N., 1996, J. Agric. Food Chem., 44, 135, 10.1021/jf950374p · DOI
  25. Lamaison J. L., 1991, Pharm. Acta Helv., 66, 188
  26. Grayer R. J., 1996, Phytochemistry, 43, 1047
  27. Schwarz K., 1992, Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 195, 103, 10.1007/BF01201765 · DOI
  28. Dorman H. J. D., 2004, J. Agric. Food Chem., 52, 770
  29. Dorman H. J. D., 2003, J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 4569
  30. Exarchou V., 2002, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 5299, 10.1021/jf020408a · DOI
  31. Ninfali P., 2005, Br. J. Nutr., 93, 266, 10.1079/BJN20041327 · DOI
  32. Miura K., 2002, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 1851, 10.1021/jf011314o · DOI
  33. Re R., 1999, Free Radical Biol. Med., 26, 1237
  34. Cai Y. Z., 2004, Life Sci., 74, 2184
  35. Santos-Buelga, C.; Williamson, G.Methods in Polyphenol Analysis; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, U.K., 2003; p 383.
  36. Duthie G. G., 1999, Br. J. Nutr., 81, 426, 10.1017/S0007114599000768 · DOI
  37. Singh G., 2004, J. Sci. Food Agric., 84, 1884
  38. Koleva I. I., 2003, J. Sci. Food Agric., 83, 819, 10.1002/jsfa.1415 · DOI
  39. Lee K. G., 2001, Food Chem., 74, 448
  40. Sakakibara H., 2003, J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 581, 10.1021/jf020926l · DOI
  41. Masuda T., 2001, J. Agric. Food Chem., 49, 5565
  42. Cuvelier M. E., 1996, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 73, 652, 10.1007/BF02518121 · DOI
  43. Vosgen B., 1980, Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 170, 207, 10.1007/BF01042541 · DOI
  44. Nakatani N., 1992, Phenolic Compounds in Food and Their Effects on Health, 2, 97

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shan, B., Cai, Y. Z., Sun, M., & Corke, H.
Affiliations
Department of Botany and Department of Zoology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-09-09
Volume
53
Issue
20
Pages
7749-7759
ISSN
  • 0021-8561
  • 1520-5118
DOI
10.1021/jf051513y
Cited by
1,079
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.