Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Throughput Relative DPPH Radical Scavenging Capacity Assay

Cheng, Zhihong, Moore, Jeffrey, Yu, Liangli (Lucy)·2006·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

A high-throughput relative 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging capacity (RDSC) assay was developed and validated in the present study. This RDSC assay is easy to perform and has acceptable accuracy (90-110% recovery), precision [3.9-7.0% pooled relative standard deviation (RSD)], and reproducibility (2.2 and 3.5% interday and intraday RSD). This assay reports the RDSC values for antioxidant samples, which make it possible to compare the DPPH radical scavenging capacities of antioxidants determined in different laboratories. The RDSC assay may be conducted in aqueous alcohol and acetone for hydrophilic antioxidants or in the organic solvents for lipophilic antioxidants without solubilizing agents, which makes it possible to directly compare the radical scavenging capacities of hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants. In addition, the high-throughput RDSC assay could be utilized for EC50 value estimation. The high-throughput RDSC assay may be used for screening and investigating potential natural antioxidants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf0611668

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, Z., Moore, J., & Yu, L. (.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2006-09-07
Volume
54
Issue
20
Pages
7429-7436
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2060093563
Cited by
405
References
10
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.