The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure and Dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E Water Models at 298 K
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations of five water models, the TIP3P (original and modified), SPC (original and refined), and SPC/E (original), were performed using the CHARMM molecular mechanics program. All simulations were carried out in the microcanonical NVE ensemble, using 901 water molecules in a cubic simulation cell furnished with periodic boundary conditions at 298 K. The SHAKE algorithm was used to keep water molecules rigid. Nanosecond trajectories were calculated with all water models for high statistical accuracy. The characteristic self-diffusion coefficients D and radial distribution functions, g OO, g OH, and g HH for all five water models were determined and compared to experimental data. The effects of velocity rescaling on the self-diffusion coefficient D were examined. All these empirical water models used in this study are similar by having three interaction sites, but the small differences in their pair potentials composed of Lennard-Jones (LJ) and Coulombic terms give significant differences in the calculated self-diffusion coefficients, and in the height of the second peak of the radial distribution function g OO .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carpenter, T. S., Kirshner, D. A., Lau, E. Y., Wong, S. E., Nilmeier, J. P., & Lightstone, F. C. (2014) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.024 · Cited by 306
Zhang (2017) · doi:10.3390/molecules23020228 · Cited by 93
Yang, Y., Lightstone, F. C., & Wong, S. E. (2013) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2013.749853 · Cited by 65
Mas-y-Mas, S., Barbon, M., Teyssier, C., Déméné, H., Carvalho, J. E., Bird, L. E., Lebedev, A., Fattori, J., Schubert, M., Dumas, C., et al. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165139 · Cited by 43
ExEnDiff: An Experiment-Guided Diffusion Model for Protein Conformational Ensemble Generation
Liu, Y., Yu, Z., Lindsay, R. J., Lin, G., Chen, M., Sahoo, A., & Hanson, S. M. (2025) · PRX Life · doi:10.1103/prxlife.3.023013 · Cited by 28
Kao, C.-F., Tsai, M.-H., Carillo, K. J., Tzou, D.-L., & Chang, W. (2023) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011500 · Cited by 13
LassoPred: a tool to predict the 3D structure of lasso peptides
Ouyang, X., Ran, X., Xu, H., Al-Abssi, R., Zhao, Y.-L., Link, A. J., & Yang, Z. J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60544-4 · Cited by 11
An NADH-controlled gatekeeper of ATP synthase
Schildhauer, F., Ryl, P. S. J., Lauer, S. M., Lenz, S., Barlas, A. B., Ouzounidis, V. R., Jeffrey, K., Marcu, D.-C., O’Reilly, F. J., Graziadei, A., et al. (2025) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2025.06.007 · Cited by 11
Lawrenz, J., Wettstein, L., Rodríguez Alfonso, A., Nchioua, R., von Maltitz, P., Albers, D. P. J., Zech, F., Vandeput, J., Naesens, L., Fois, G., et al. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202506430 · Cited by 8
Nuclear Receptor Interdomain Communication is Mediated by the Hinge with Ligand Specificity
Hazarika, S., Yu, T., Biswas, A., Dube, N., Villalona, P., & Okafor, C. D. (2024) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168805 · Cited by 7
DNA Wrapping by a tetrameric bacterial histone
(2025) · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67425-w · Cited by 7
Berardinelli, D., Taoussi, O., Ovat, D. Y., Pichini, S., Pulver, B., Auwärter, V., Busardò, F. P., Basile, G., Laudadio, E., & Carlier, J. (2026) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-025-04163-4 · Cited by 5
Molecular insights into the role of Estrogen Receptor Beta in Ecdysterone Mediated Anabolic Activity
Tariq, S. S., Sardar, M., Shafiq, M., Heinz, H., Nur-e-Alam, M., Ahmed, A., & Ul-Haq, Z. (2025) · PLoS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0320865 · Cited by 4
“The eight systems were immersed in a solvent environment generated with TIP3P [20], an explicit water model, inside a periodic box with atoms of the protein separated by at least 10 Å.”
Raza, S., Yadav, N. S., Jussupow, A., Kerfeld, C. A., Feig, M., & Vermaas, J. V. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c05178 · Cited by 4
Regulatory Interactions between APOBEC3B N- and C-Terminal Domains
Braza, M. K. E., Demir, Ö., Ahn, S.-H., Morris, C. K., Calvó-Tusell, C., McGuire, K. L., de la Peña Avalos, B., Carpenter, M. A., Chen, Y., Casalino, L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02272 · Cited by 3
Ulug, M. E., Ikram, S., Sayyah, E., & Durdağı, S. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142602 · Cited by 3
Chattopadhyay, A., Fatehi, M., Mosa, F. E. S., Gruber, B., Light, P. E., & Barakat, K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-30298-6 · Cited by 2
Elder, L. H., & Onufriev, A. V. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02263 · Cited by 2
Kamboj, S., Harms, C., Wright, D., Nash, A., Klein-Seetharaman, J., & Sarkar, S. K. (2022) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1258797/v1 · Cited by 1
Deciphering GB1’s Single Mutational Landscape: Insights from MuMi Analysis
Guclu, T. F., Atilgan, A. R., & Atilgan, C. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04916
Chaudhuri, A., Das, S., & Chakrabarti, S. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137154
Metadata
- Authors
- Mark, P., & Nilsson, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-10-06
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 9954-9960
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2060079863
- Cited by
- 4,571
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
