Cited by 211Luminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

Near-Infrared Fluorescent Dye-Doped Semiconducting Polymer Dots

Open access
Jin, Yuhui, Ye, Fangmao, Zeigler, Maxwell, Wu, Changfeng, Chiu, Daniel T.·2011·ACS Nano

Abstract

Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence sensing is desirable for in vivo biological measurements, but the method is currently limited by the availability of NIR fluorescent markers as well as by their poor performance, such as self-aggregation and dim fluorescence, in a physiological environment. To address this issue, this paper describes a NIR fluorescent polymer dot (Pdot) that emits at 777 nm. This Pdot was comparable in size to a water-soluble NIR quantum dot that emits at 800 nm (ITK Qdot800) but was about four times brighter and with a narrower emission peak. We formed the NIR Pdot by doping the NIR dye, silicon 2,3-naphthalocyanine bis(trihexylsilyloxide) (NIR775), into the matrix of poly (9,9-dioctylfluorene-co-benzothiadiazole) (PFBT) as the Pdot formed using a nanoscale precipitation technique. Free molecules of NIR775 aggregate in aqueous solution, but encapsulating them into the hydrophobic Pdot matrix effectively introduced them into aqueous solution for use in biological studies. Most importantly, the brightness of NIR775 was dramatically enhanced because of the excellent light-harvesting ability of PFBT and the very efficient energy transfer from PFBT to NIR775. We anticipate this bright NIR Pdot will be useful in biological measurements and cellular imaging where strong NIR emission is beneficial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn103304m

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jin, Y., Ye, F., Zeigler, M., Wu, C., & Chiu, D. T.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Chiu, Daniel T.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2011-01-31
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
1468-1475
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2094205807
Cited by
211
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 147837, R21CA147831)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS062725, R01NS062725)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
near-infrared fluorescence, polymer dots, silicon naphthalocyanine, energy transfer, light harvesting, nanoscale precipitation, fluorescence enhancement, self-aggregation, cell imaging
MeSH terms
Energy Transfer, Fluorenes, Fluorescent Dyes, Infrared Rays, Polymers, Semiconductors, Silanes, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Nanoparticles, Optical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review