Cited by 85Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The C-Score: A Bayesian Framework to Sharply Improve Proteoform Scoring in High-Throughput Top Down Proteomics

Open access
LeDuc, Richard D., Fellers, Ryan T., Early, Bryan P., Greer, Joseph B., Thomas, Paul M., Kelleher, Neil L.·2014·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

The automated processing of data generated by top down proteomics would benefit from improved scoring for protein identification and characterization of highly related protein forms (proteoforms). Here we propose the “C-score” (short for Characterization Score), a Bayesian approach to the proteoform identification and characterization problem, implemented within a framework to allow the infusion of expert knowledge into generative models that take advantage of known properties of proteins and top down analytical systems (e.g., fragmentation propensities, “off-by-1 Da” discontinuous errors, and intelligent weighting for site-specific modifications). The performance of the scoring system based on the initial generative models was compared to the current probability-based scoring system used within both ProSightPC and ProSightPTM on a manually curated set of 295 human proteoforms. The current implementation of the C-score framework generated a marked improvement over the existing scoring system as measured by the area under the curve on the resulting ROC chart (AUC of 0.99 versus 0.78).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr401277r

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Edwards A. W. F. Likelihood; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1972.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeDuc, R. D., Fellers, R. T., Early, B. P., Greer, J. B., Thomas, P. M., & Kelleher, N. L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • LeDuc, Richard D.
  • Kelleher, Neil L.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2014-06-12
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
3231-3240
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W2000710548
Cited by
85
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (ABI-1062432)
  • National Institutes of Health (P30 DA018310, R01 GM067193)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
C-score, proteoform identification, top-down proteomics, protein characterization, generative models, expert knowledge integration, site-specific modification
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Bacterial Proteins, Bayes Theorem, Data Interpretation, Statistical, HeLa Cells, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Mapping, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ROC Curve, Area Under Curve, Proteome, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review