Cited by 443Environmental Impact and SustainabilityBiofuel production and bioconversionEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated

Plevin, Richard J., Jones, Andrew D., Torn, Margaret S., Gibbs, Holly K.·2010·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions induced by increased biofuel consumption are highly uncertain: individual estimates vary from each other and each has a wide intrinsic error band. Using a reduced-form model, we estimated that the bounding range for emissions from indirect land-use change (ILUC) from US corn ethanol expansion was 10 to 340 g CO(2) MJ(-1). Considering various probability distributions to model parameters, the broadest 95% central interval, i.e., between the 2.5 and 97.5%ile values, ranged from 21 to 142 g CO(2)e MJ(-1). ILUC emissions from US corn ethanol expansion thus range from small, but not negligible, to several times greater than the life cycle emissions of gasoline. The ILUC emissions estimates of 30 g CO(2) MJ(-1) for the California Air Resources Board and 34 g CO(2)e MJ(-1) by USEPA (for 2022) are at the low end of the plausible range. The lack of data and understanding (epistemic uncertainty) prevents convergence of judgment on a central value for ILUC emissions. The complexity of the global system being modeled suggests that this range is unlikely to narrow substantially in the near future. Fuel policies that require narrow bounds around point estimates of life cycle GHG emissions are thus incompatible with current and anticipated modeling capabilities. Alternative policies that address the risks associated with uncertainty are more likely to achieve GHG reductions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es101946t

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative environmental impacts due to an increase in land demand for biomass production include more greenhouse gas emissions due to indirect land-use changes.

    “On the environmental sustainability aspect, there will also be negative environmental impacts due to the increase in land demand for biomass production, including more greenhouse gas emissions (responsible for global warming) due to indirect landuse changes (e.g., deforestation for growing energy crops [Plevin et al., 2010]).”

    From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Plevin et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plevin, R. J., Jones, A. D., Torn, M. S., & Gibbs, H. K.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Plevin, Richard J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2010-10-13
Volume
44
Issue
21
Pages
8015-8021
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2034149162
Cited by
443
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 49
FWCI
44.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Keywords
indirect land use change, biofuels, corn ethanol, life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, uncertainty, epistemic uncertainty, fuel policy, California Air Resources Board, USEPA, gasoline comparison
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Ethanol, Zea mays, Models, Chemical, Greenhouse Effect, Uncertainty, Biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review