CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 154Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fear activation and habituation patterns as early process predictors of response to prolonged exposure treatment in PTSD

van Minnen, Agnes, Hagenaars, Muriel·2002·Journal of Traumatic Stress
DOI 10.1023/a:1020177023209
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Improved (n = 21) and nonimproved (n = 13) PTSD patients (a mixed trauma population) were compared for fear activation and habituation patterns during and between the 1st and 2nd prolonged exposure sessions. Drop‐outs (n = 11) were also evaluated. Nonimproved patients had significantly higher ratings of anxiety at the start of the first exposure session. Improved patients showed more within‐session habituation during the self‐exposures at home and more between‐session habituation. Even after controlling for initial PTSD and depression symptom severity, habituation between the first and second exposure sessions was significantly related to treatment outcome. Patients who dropped out of the treatment were found not to differ from completers on fear activation and within‐session habituation during the first exposure session.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020177023209

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only two studies have examined homework adherence in individuals with PTSD.

    “We are aware of only two studies in individuals with PTSD (Vaughan & Tarrier, 1992; van Minnen et al., 2002).”

    From Does change in distress matter? Mechanisms of change in prolonged exposure for PTSD (2014) · cites this paper as van Minnen et al., 2002

  • In another study, a limited measure of homework compliance was not associated with clinical improvement.

    “In the other (van Minnen et al., 2002), a limited measure of homework compliance was not associated with clinical improvement.”

    From Does change in distress matter? Mechanisms of change in prolonged exposure for PTSD (2014) · cites this paper as van Minnen et al., 2002

  • van Minnen and Hagenaars (2002) found that greater habituation between early therapy sessions (session 1 to session 2) was associated with better treatment outcome.

    “Similarly, van Minnen and Hagenaars (2002) found that greater habituation between early therapy sessions, session 1 to session 2, was associated with better treatment outcome.”

    From Does change in distress matter? Mechanisms of change in prolonged exposure for PTSD (2014) · cites this paper as van Minnen and Hagenaars (2002)

  • van Minnen and Hagenaars (2002) examined average distress but only at session 1 and session 2.

    “The van Minnen and Hagenaars (2002) examined average distress but only at session 1 and session 2.”

    From Does change in distress matter? Mechanisms of change in prolonged exposure for PTSD (2014) · cites this paper as van Minnen and Hagenaars (2002)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Arrindell W. A., 1986, SCL‐90: Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie‐indicator [SCL‐90: Manual of a multidimensional psychopathology indicator]
  2. Foa E. B., 1982, Practical applications of learning theories in psychiatry, 129
  3. Hiller W., 1990, Münich Diagnostic Checklists for DSM‐III‐R and ICD‐10
  4. Van der Ploeg H. M., 1980, Handleiding bij de Zelf‐Beoordelings Vragenlijst [Manual of the Dutch Version of the STAI]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
van Minnen, A., & Hagenaars, M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
ORCID
Hagenaars, Muriel
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
359-367
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
DOI
10.1023/a:1020177023209
OpenAlex
W2130288907
Cited by
154
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1003 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, prolonged exposure therapy, treatment outcome predictors, treatment discontinuation, anxiety, depression, self-exposure
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Fear, Female, Forecasting, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Tape Recording, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review