CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 212Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing Change in Early Intervention Programs for Children with Autism

Kasari, Connie·2002·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOI 10.1023/a:1020546006971
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Assessing the efficacy of any intervention can be a difficult task. In the case of children with autism who require comprehensive and long-lasting interventions, the task becomes even more difficult. In this paper, intervention studies based on comprehensive interventions for young children with autism are reviewed and examined in reference to elements that are essential to a well-designed treatment study, e.g., randomization/matching procedures, and outcome measures. Given the complexity of these comprehensive intervention programs, and the few data available on interventions with clear empirical validation, a plea is made for studies to consider the active ingredients or component parts of an intervention, e.g., number of hours, type of setting, and teaching approach. Suggestions are further made for improving future studies, including more rigorous designs, and measuring change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020546006971

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
  2. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional models: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.
  3. Dawson, G., & Osterling, J. (1997). Early intervention in autism. In Guralnick, M. J. (Ed.), Effectiveness of Early Intervention (pp. 307–326). Baltimore, MD: Brooks.
  4. Greenspan, S. I., Wieder, S., & Simons, R. (1998). The child with special needs: Encouraging intellectual and emotional growth. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
  5. Schreibman, L. (1988). Autism: Developmental clinical psychology and psychiatry series. Vol. 15. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kasari, C.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Kasari, Connie
ORCID
Kasari, Connie
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-10
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
447-461
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
DOI
10.1023/a:1020546006971
OpenAlex
W1509196853
Cited by
212
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, early intervention, intervention efficacy, outcome measures, young children
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Forecasting, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review