Cited by 87Attachment and Relationship DynamicsConflict Management and NegotiationForgiveness and Related Behaviors

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 51 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 4 are not checked yet.

The Authenticity of Conflict Resolutions Among Adult Couples: Does Women's Other-Oriented Behavior Reflect Their True Selves?

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021692109040

Cites

51 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compliance as a conflict style requires individuals to subordinate personal needs and has been associated with a lack of authenticity in romantic relationships.

    “As a conflict style, compliance requires individuals to subordinate personal needs and has been associated with a lack of authenticity in romantic relationships (Neff & Harter, 2002).”

    From Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict (2010) · cites this paper as Neff & Harter, 2002

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Baldwin, J. M. (1897). Social and ethical interpretations in mental development: Astudy in social psychology. NewYork: Macmillan.
  2. Emde, R. N., & Buchsbaum. H. (1990). “Didn't I hear my Mommy? ”: Autonomy with connectedness in moral self-emergence. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghley (Eds.), The self in transition: From infancy to childhood (pp. 35-60). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
  4. Roloff, M. E., & Cloven, D. H. (1990). The chilling effect in in-terpersonal relationships: The reluctance to speak one's mind. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 49-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  5. Selman, R. L. (1989) Fostering intimacy and autonomy. In Damon, W. (Ed). Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 409-435). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Spitzberg, B. H., Canary, D. J., & Cupach, W. R. (1994). A competence-based approach to the study of interpersonal conflict. In D. D. Cahn (Eds.), Conflict in interpersonal relationships (pp. 183-202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  7. Watson, C. (1994). Gender differences in negotiating behavior and outcomes: Fact of artifact? In A. Taylor & J. B. Miller (Eds.), Conflict and gender (pp. 191-210). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Neff, K. D., & Harter, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Neff, Kristin D.
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2002-11
Volume
47
Issue
9-10
Pages
403-417
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W1720910288
Cited by
87
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Keywords
conflict resolution, authenticity, heterosexual couples, gender differences, compromise, mental health, self-concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review