CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Power and Personality: An Analysis of Gay Male Intimate Abuse

Landolt, Monica A., Dutton, Donald G.·1997·Sex Roles
DOI 10.1023/a:1025649306193
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025649306193

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerning psychological IPV, perpetration was positively correlated with attachment anxiety (r = 0.18), fearful attachment (r = 0.40), and preoccupied attachment (r = 0.26), and negatively correlated with secure attachment styles (r = −0.37).

    “Concerning psychological IPV (Landolt and Dutton, 1997; Bartholomew et al., 2008), perpetration turned out to be positively correlated to the attachment dimension of anxiety (r = 0.18) and to fearful (r = 0.40) and preoccupied (r = 0.26) and negatively correlated to secure attachment styles (r = −0.37).”

    From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Landolt and Dutton, 1997

  • For physical IPV, perpetration was positively correlated with fearful attachment style (r = 0.34) and attachment anxiety (r = 0.19), but negatively correlated with avoidance (r = −0.22).

    “For physical IPV (Landolt and Dutton, 1997; Bartholomew et al., 2008), correlations are different: perpetration of this form of violence is positively correlated with fearful attachment style (r = 0.34) and with the attachment dimensions of anxiety (r = 0.19), but it is negatively correlated with avoidance (r = −0.22).”

    From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Landolt and Dutton, 1997

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., Loseke, D. R., & Rauma, D. (1981). Mutual combat and other family violence myths. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  2. Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In M. Bograd & K. Yllo (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  3. Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence. New York: Simon & Shuster.
  4. Gunderson, J. G. (1984). Borderline Personality Disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  5. Harry, J. (1984). Gay couples. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  6. Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  7. Kelly, E. E., & Warshafsky, L. (July, 1987). Partner abuse in gay male and lesbian couples. Paper presented at the Third National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.
  8. Kernberg, O. (1977). The structural diagnosis of borderline personality organization. In P. Hartocollis (Ed.), Borderline Personality Disorder: The concept, the syndrome, the patient. New York: International Universities Press.
  9. Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  10. McWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  11. Oldham, J., Clarkin, J., Appelbaum, A., Carr, A., Kernberg, P., Lotterman, A., & Haas, G. (1985). A self-report instrument for Borderline Personality Organization. In T. H. McGlashan (Ed.), The Borderline: Current empirical research. The progress in psychiatry series. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  12. Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1983). The intimate relationships of lesbian and gay men. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), The changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
  13. van der Kolk, B. (1987). Psychological trauma. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Landolt, M. A., & Dutton, D. G.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Sex Roles
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1997-09
Volume
37
Issue
5-6
Pages
335-359
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
DOI
10.1023/a:1025649306193
OpenAlex
W204660642
Cited by
55
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, gay men, psychological violence, division of powers, egalitarian relationships, borderline personality, sexual orientation, couples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review