CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,376Migraine and Headache StudiesHealth Education and ValidationSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™

Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M.S., Bjorner, J.B., Ware, J.E., Garber, W.H., Batenhorst, A., Cady, R., Dahlöf, C.G.H., Dowson, A., Tepper, S.·2003·Quality of Life Research
DOI 10.1023/a:1026119331193
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Migraine and other severe headaches can cause suffering and reduce functioning and productivity. Patients are the best source of information about such impact.Objective To develop a new short form (HIT-6) for assessing the impact of headaches that has broad content coverage but is brief as well as reliable and valid enough to use in screening and monitoring patients in clinical research and practice.Methods HIT-6 items were selected from an existing item pool of 54 items and from 35 items suggested by clinicians. Items were selected and modified based on content validity, item response theory (IRT) information functions, item internal consistency, distributions of scores, clinical validity, and linguistic analyses. The HIT-6 was evaluated in an Internet-based survey of headache sufferers (n = 1103) who were members of America Online (AOL). After 14 days, 540 participated in a follow-up survey.Results HIT-6 covers six content categories represented in widely used surveys of headache impact. Internal consistency, alternate forms, and test-retest reliability estimates of HIT-6 were 0.89, 0.90, and 0.80, respectively. Individual patient score confidence intervals (95%) of app. +/-5 were observed for 88% of all respondents. In tests of validity in discriminating across diagnostic and headache severity groups, relative validity (RV) coefficients of 0.82 and 1.00 were observed for HIT-6, in comparison with the Total Score. Patient-level classifications based in HIT-6 were accurate 88.7% of the time at the recommended cut-off score for a probability of migraine diagnosis. HIT-6 was responsive to self-reported changes in headache impact.Conclusions The IRT model estimated for a 'pool' of items from widely used measures of headache impact was useful in constructing an efficient, reliable, and valid 'static' short form (HIT-6) for use in screening and monitoring patient outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026119331193

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ware JE, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Med Care 2000; 38(Suppl II, 9): 1173–1182.
  2. Kerlinger FN. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
  3. Bjorner JB, Ware JE, Kosinski M, Diamond M, Tepper S, Dowson A, Bayliss MS, Batenhorst AS. Validation of the Headache Impact TestTM using patient-reported symptoms and headache severity. In: Olesen J, Steiner TJ, Lipton RB (eds), Reducing the Burden of Headache. Oxford University Press, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M. S., Bjorner, J. B., Ware, J. E., Garber, W. H., Batenhorst, A., Cady, R., Dahlöf, C. G. H., Dowson, A., & Tepper, S.
Affiliations
  • TerraMetrics (United States) (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Headache Care Center (US)
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Kosinski, M.
ORCID
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-12
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
963-974
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
DOI
10.1023/a:1026119331193
OpenAlex
W204766049
Cited by
1,376
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 39
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
HIT-6, headache impact, migraine, short-form questionnaire, item response theory, content validity, reliability statistics, validity, patient-reported outcomes, headache severity, questionnaire development
MeSH terms
Adult, Calibration, Headache, Humans, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Sickness Impact Profile, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review