Cited by 170Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect Resistance and GeneticsInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the risks of insect resistant transgenic plants on entomophagous arthropods: Bt-maize expressing Cry1Ab as a case study

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026313719424

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amount of Bt protein ingested by natural enemies is highly variable and depends on the concentration of the Bt protein in the plant, the stability of the Bt protein, the time of the last meal, the mode of feeding of the herbivore and the natural enemy, and behavior.

    “But the amount of Bt protein ingested by natural enemies is highly variable and depends on the concentration of the Bt protein in the plant, the stability of the Bt protein, the time of the last meal, the mode of feeding of the herbivore and the natural enemy, and behavior (Dutton et al., 2003;Romeis et al., 2009).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Dutton et al., 2003

  • Studies with Bt maize pollen from events MON810 and Bt11 lacked exposure given very low concentrations of Cry proteins in pollen of this event.

    “Studies conducted with Bt maize pollen from events MON810 and Bt11 (Meissle et al., 2014;Obrist et al., 2006c) also lacked exposure given the very low concentrations of Cry proteins in the pollen of this event (Dutton et al., 2003;Nguyen and Jehle, 2007).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Dutton et al., 2003

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Anglade, P., 1975. Corn pest management in western Europe exemplified by French systems. International Project on Ostrinia nubilalis, Rep. 2: 42–46.
  2. Asín, L. and X. Pons, 1998. Aphid predators in maize fields. IOBC Bull. 21(8): 163–170.
  3. Attia, B.M., 1985. Ökologische Beziehungen zwischen Maisblattläusen, polyphagen Prädatoren und dem Maiszünsler Ostrina nubilalis Hbn. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut für Phytomedizin der Unversität Hohenheim, Germany. 96 pp.
  4. Bailly, R., G. Dubois, A. Fougeroux, J.P Gendrier et al., 1984. Les Auxiliaires: Enemies naturels des revageurs des cultures. Association de Coordination Technique Agricole, Paris, France. 64 pp.
  5. Barrett, K., N. Grandy, E.G. Harrison and S. Hassan, 1994. Guidance document on regulatory testing procedures for pesticides with non-target arthropods. In: P. Ommen (ed), SETAC, Brussels. 50 pp.
  6. Cabanettes, J.P., 1985. Mais: Bilan phytosanitaire. Phytoma 366: 15–16.
  7. Cagáň, L. and P. Bokor, 1998. Sinophorus turionus Ratz, the parasitoid of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn in Slovakia, Czech Republic and Southwestern Poland. Acta Pythopathol. Entomol. Hung. 33: 435–445.
  8. Candolfi, M.P., K.L. Barrett, P.J. Cambell, R. Forster, N. Grandy, M-C. Huet, G. Lewis, P.A. Oomen, R. Schmuck and H. Vogt, 2001. Guidance document on regulatory testing and risk assessment procedures for plant protection products with non-target arthropods. ESCORT 2 Workshop held in Wageningen, The Netherlands. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA. 46 pp.
  9. Digilio, M.C. and F. Pennacchio, 1989. Quantitative analysis of some biological parameters characterising an Italian population of Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae). B. Lab. Entomol. Agri. Filippo-Silvestri 46: 59–74.
  10. Dolinka, B., 1975. Pest control in corn on the Danube plain illustrated by the Hungarian examples. International Project on Ostrinia nubilalis, Rep. 2: 35–41.
  11. Eizaguirre, M. and R. Albajes, 1987. Pest status of maize arthropod pests in the northeast of Spain. In: F. Szentkiralyi (ed), International Symposium on Maize Arthropods, Gödöllö, Hungary. Plant protection Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, p. 18.
  12. Fougeroux, A., 1984. Les insectes prédateurs et parasites de pucerons en culture de blé et de maïs. Phytoma June. pp. 35–39.
  13. Gerginov, L., 1987. Maize pests in Bulgaria and pest control. In: F. Szentkiralyi (ed), International Symposium on Maize Arthropods, Plant protection Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Gödöllö, Hungary, p. 21.
  14. Hassan, S.A. 1992. Meeting of the workshop group Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms, University of Southampton, UK September, 1991. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin XV(3): 1–3.
  15. Hurle, K., M. Lechner and K. König, 1996. Mais: Unkräuter – Schädlinge – Krankheiten. Verlag Th. Mann, Gelsenkirchen, Germany. pp. 1–116.
  16. James, C., 2002. Global status of commercialised transgenic crops: 2002. ISAAA Briefs, no. 27. EuroCenter, Northwich, UK. pp. 1–24.
  17. Katz, P., 1993. Analyse der Populationsdynamik von Maisblattläuse. Ph.D Thesis, Institut für Phytomedizin der Universität Hohenheim, Germany. 151 pp.
  18. Kiss, J., F. Szentkirályi, F. Tóth, Á. Szénási, F. Kádár, K. Árpás, D. Szekeres and C.R. Edwards, 2003. Bt-corn: Impact on non-target and adjusting to local IPM systems. In: T. Lelley, E. Balázs and M. Tepfer (eds), Ecological Impact of GMO Dissemination in Agro-Ecosystems, Facultas Verlags-und Buchhandels AG, Austria. pp. 157–172.
  19. Kokubu, H., 1986. Migration rates, in situ reproduction, and flight characteristics of aphidophagous insects (Chrysopidae, Coccinellidae, Syrphidae) in corn fields. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Zoology, University of Basel, Switzerland. 184 pp.
  20. Kot, J. and T. Bilewicz-Pawinska, 1987. From studies of maize entomofauna in Warsaw region. In: F. Szentkiralyi (ed), International Symposium on Maize Arthropods, Plant protection Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Gödöllö, Hungary. p. 34.
  21. Longauerova, J., 1987. Some problems with arthropods on maize in Czechoslovakia. In: F. Szentkiralyi (ed), International Symposium on Maize Arthropods, Plant protection Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Gödöllö, Hungary. p. 36.
  22. Plewka, T. and M. Pankanin-Franczyk, 1989. Aphids and aphidophages on maize in central Poland. Acta Phytopathol. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 24: 169–171.
  23. Polgar, L., 1984. The role of aphid parasites (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) in the maize ecosystem. Acta Phytopathol. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 17: 139–145.
  24. Reh, P., 1985. Untersuchungen zur Populationsdynamik des Maiszünslers Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut für Phytomedizin der Universität Hohenheim, Germany. 131 pp.
  25. Schmitz, G. and D. Bartsch, 2001. Biozoenotische Untersuchungen in Maisfeldern bei Bonn und Aachen. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie 13: 615–618.
  26. Visnyovszky, E. and V. Rácz, 1989. Investigation of Syrphids in maize stands. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hungar. 24: 219–223.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dutton, A., Romeis, J., & Bigler, F.
Venue
BioControl
Published
2003-12
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
611-636
ISSN
  • 1386-6141 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-8248
OpenAlex
W327032242
Cited by
170
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
21.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BioControl (publishedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Bt maize, Cry1Ab toxin, natural enemies, risk assessment framework, non-target effects, Chrysoperla carnea, Neuroptera, sensitivity experiments, predators and parasitoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review