Cited by 600Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting YouthAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The differential relations of parent and peer attachment to adolescent adjustment

Laible, Deborah J., Carlo, Gustavo, Raffaelli, Marcela·2000·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005169004882

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Raffaelli, M.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2000-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
45-59
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2146263091
Cited by
600
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
parental attachment, peer attachment, adolescent adjustment, peer relationships, parent-adolescent relationships, aggression, depression, anxiety, sympathy, academic efficacy, emotional relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review