Cited by 135Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Parent and peer attachment as predictors of Facebook addiction symptoms in different developmental stages (early adolescents and adolescents).

Badenes-Ribera, L., Fabris, M.A., Gastaldi, F.G.M., Prino, L.E., Longobardi, C.·2019·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Facebook Addiction (FA) is a problem that concerns minors all over the world. The attachment bond with peers and parents has been proven to be a risk factor for the onset of FA. However, the family and peer group can have a different importance depending on the developmental period of the minor. This study examined the influence of peer and parental attachment on the symptoms of FA in early adolescents and adolescents to verify whether attachment to peers and parents predicts FA symptoms in both categories respectively. The sample was composed of 598 participants (142 early adolescents) between the ages of 11 and 17 years (M age = 14.82, SD = 1.52) recruited in the school setting. Multivariate multiple regressions were performed. For early adolescents the relationships with their parents influenced the levels of FA the most (such as withdrawal, conflict, and relapse), whereas peer relationships (such as, peer alienation) were the most relevant for adolescents. Our study provides support to the role of attachment to peers and parents as a risk factor for symptoms of FA. In line with developmental theories, parents and peers acquire a different weight in predicting the relationship between attachment and FA for early adolescents and adolescents respectively. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.009

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badenes-Ribera, L., Fabris, M. A., Gastaldi, F. G. M., Prino, L. E., & Longobardi, C.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Longobardi, C.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
95
Pages
226-232
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944359123
Cited by
134
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 3
FWCI
30.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
Facebook addiction, social media addiction, parental attachment, peer attachment, early adolescents, adolescents, developmental stages, peer alienation, addiction symptoms, risk factors, family relationships
MeSH terms
Online Social Networking, Adolescent, Affect, Child, Communication, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Italy, Male, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Peer Group, Risk Factors, Social Alienation, Behavior, Addictive, Dissent and Disputes, Trust, Family Conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review