Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,610

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information

Viola, Paul, Wells III, William M.·1997·International Journal of Computer Vision

Abstract

A new information-theoretic approach is presented for finding the pose of an object in an image. The technique does not require information about the surface properties of the object, besides its shape, and is robust with respect to variations of illumination. In our derivation few assumptions are made about the nature of the imaging process. As a result the algorithms are quite general and may foreseeably be used in a wide variety of imaging situations.Experiments are presented that demonstrate the approach registering magnetic resonance (MR) images, aligning a complex 3D object model to real scenes including clutter and occlusion, tracking a human head in a video sequence and aligning a view-based 2D object model to real images.The method is based on a formulation of the mutual information between the model and the image. As applied here the technique is intensity-based, rather than feature-based. It works well in domains where edge or gradient-magnitude based methods have difficulty, yet it is more robust than traditional correlation. Additionally, it has an efficient implementation that is based on stochastic approximation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007958904918

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Becker, S. and Hinton, G. E. 1992. Learning to make coherent predictions in domains with discontinuities. In Advances in Neural Information Processing, J. E. Moody, S. J. Hanson, and R. P. Lippmann, (Eds.), Denver 1991. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, vol. 4.
  2. Bell, A. J. and Sejnowski, T. J. 1995. An information-maximisation approach to blind separation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing, Denver 1994. Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, vol. 4.
  3. Besl, P. and Jain, R. 1985. Three-dimensional object recognition. Computing Surveys, 17:75-145. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bridle, J. S. 1989. Training stochastic model recognition algorithms as networks can lead to maximum mutual information estimation of parameters. In Advances in Neural Information Processing 2, D. S. Touretzky (Ed.), Morgan Kaufman, pp. 211-217.
  5. Chin, R. and Dyer, C. 1986. Model-based recognition in robot vision. Computing Surveys, 18:67-108. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Collignon, A., Vandermuelen, D., Suetens, P., and Marchal, G. 1995. 3D multi-modality medical image registration using feature space clustering. In Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine, N. Ayache (Ed.), Springer Verlag, pp. 195-204. · DOI
  7. Cover, T. M. and Thomas, J. A. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley and Sons.
  8. Duda, R. and Hart, P. 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. John Wiley and Sons.
  9. Hill, D. L., Studholme, C., and Hawkes, D. J. 1994. Voxel similarity measures for automated image registration. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Visualization in Biomedical Computing, pp. 205-216, SPIE. · DOI
  10. Horn, B. 1986. Robot Vision. McGraw-Hill: New York.
  11. Huttenlocher, D., Kedem, K., Sharir, K., and Sharir, M. 1991. The upper envelope of Voronoi surfaces and its applications. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 194-293. · DOI
  12. Linsker, R. 1986. From basic network principles to neural architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, vol. 83, pp. 7508-7512, 8390-8394, 8779-8783. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ljung, L. and Süderstrüm, T. 1983. Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification. MIT Press. · DOI
  14. Lowe, D. 1985. Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition. Kluwer Academic Publishers. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Shashua, A. 1992. Geometry and Photometry in 3D Visual Recognition. Ph. D. thesis, M. I. T Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, AITR-1401. · DOI
  16. Turk, M. and Pentland, A. 1991. Face recognition using eigenfaces. In Proceedings of the Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii, pp. 586- 591. IEEE.
  17. Viola, P. A. 1995. Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information. Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Wells III, W. 1992. Statistical Object Recognition. Ph. D. thesis, MIT Department Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cambridge, Mass. MIT AI Laboratory TR 1398.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Viola, P., & Wells III, W. M.
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
1997-09
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
137-154
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W1874027545
Cited by
2,610
References
1
FWCI
32.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.