CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,044School Choice and PerformanceEducational Assessment and ImprovementEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation

Sanders, William L., Wright, S. Paul, Horn, Sandra P.·1997·Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education
DOI 10.1023/a:1007999204543
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007999204543

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 17 references

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. CTB/McGraw-Hill (1990). Comprehensive test of basic skills (4th ed.). Spring Norms Book. Monterey, CA: CTB/Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
  2. Ellett, C. D. (1990). A new generation of classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning: Concepts, issues and controversies from pilots of the Louisiana STAR. Baton Rouge: Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects, College of Education, Louisiana State University.
  3. Kulik, J. A. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
  4. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Research Progress Report. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
  5. Sanders, W. L., Saxton, A. M., & Horn, S. P. (In press). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment Systems (TVAAS): A quantitative, outcome-based approach to educational assessment. In J. Millman (Ed.), Assuring accountability? Using gains in student learning to evaluate teachers and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  6. Travers, R. M. W. (1981). Criteria of good teaching. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 14–22). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1997-04
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
57-67
ISSN
  • 0920-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0425
DOI
10.1023/a:1007999204543
OpenAlex
W2143499905
Cited by
1,044
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 74
FWCI
57.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
teacher effects, academic performance, teacher evaluation, mixed models, academic progress, classroom context, class size, value-added assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review