CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 388Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationLegal Issues in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension to Modified Honor Code Settings

McCabe, Donald L., Treviño, Linda Klebe, Butterfield, Kenneth D.·2002·Research in Higher Education
DOI 10.1023/a:1014893102151
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1014893102151

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
  2. Dalton, J. C. (1985). Promoting Values Development in College Students. Columbus, OH: Teachers College Press.
  3. Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  4. Kohlberg, L. (1985). The just community approach to moral education in theory and practice. In M. W. Berkowitz and F. Oser (eds.), Moral Education: Theory and Practice, pp. 27-88. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. McCabe, D. L., and Pavela, G. (1997). The principled pursuit of academic integrity. AAHE Bulletin 50(4): 11-12.
  6. Melendez, B. (1985). Honor Code Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  7. Rest, J. (1993) Research on moral judgment in college students. In A. Garrod (ed.), Approaches to Moral Development: New Research and Emerging Themes, pp. 201-213. New York: Teachers College Press.
  8. Rosenhan, D. L., Moore, B. S., and Underwood, B. (1976). The social psychology of moral behavior. In T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior, pp. 241-252. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  9. Sax, L. J., Astin, A. W., Korn, W. S., and Mahoney, K. (1999). The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1999. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
  10. Treviño, L. K., and McCabe, D. L. (1998). Who's Who Among American High School Students. Lake Forest, IL; Educational Communications, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 388

Related

Metadata

Authors
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
McCabe, Donald L.
ORCID
Venue
Research in Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-06
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
357-378
ISSN
  • 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-188X
DOI
10.1023/a:1014893102151
OpenAlex
W1587372480
Cited by
374
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
academic integrity, academic dishonesty, replication, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review