Cited by 253Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Negotiated Collusion: Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents

Cassell, Justine, Bickmore, Timothy·2003·User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024026532471

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Ardissono, L., Boella, G. and Lesmo, L.: 1999, Politeness and speech acts, Proceedings of the Workshop on Attitudes, Personality and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction at the 7th International Conference on User Modeling (UM’ 99), Banff, Canada.
  2. Beskow, J. and McGlashan, S.: 1997, Olga - A Conversational Agent with Gestures, Proceedings of the IJCAI’97 Workshop on Animated Interface Agents - Making them Intelligent, August 1997, Nagoya, Japan.
  3. Brown, J.R. and Rogers, E.L.: 1991, Openness, Uncertainty and Intimacy: An epistemological reformulation. In: N. Coupland, H. Giles and J.M. Wiemann (eds.), Miscommunication and problematic talk, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 146–165.
  4. Castelfranchi, C. and de Rosis, F.: 1999, Which User Model do we need, to relax the hypothesis of ‘sincere Assertion’ in HCI?, Proceedings of the Workshop on Attitudes, Personality and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction at the 7th International Conference on User Modeling (UM’ 99), Banff, Canada.
  5. Cegala, D., Waldro, V., Ludlum, J., McCabe, B., Yost, S. and Teboul, B.: 1988, A study of interactants’ thoughts and feelings during conversation., Ninth Annual Conference on Discourse Analysis, Philadelphia, PA.
  6. Depaulo, B. and Friedman, H.: 1998, Nonverbal Communication. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Boston: McGraw-Hill, pp. 3–40.
  7. Hanks, S.: 1994, Discourse Planning: Technical Challenges for the Planning Community., AAAI Workshop on Planning for Inter-Agent Communication. Seattle, WA.
  8. Moon, Y.: 1998, Intimate self-disclosure exchanges: Using computers to build reciprocal relationships with consumers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Report: 99-059.
  9. Wiggins, J.:1979, A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395–412. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cassell, J., & Bickmore, T.
Affiliations
MIT Media Lab (US)
Corresponding author
Cassell, Justine
Venue
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Published
2003-02
Volume
13
Issue
1-2
Pages
89-132
ISSN
  • 0924-1868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1391
OpenAlex
W2139717362
Cited by
253
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
20.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
social language, small talk, embodied conversational agents, interpersonal trust, credibility, user modeling, discourse planning, relationship negotiation, personality traits, human-agent interaction, multimodal cues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review