CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,000Action Observation and SynchronizationEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry

Lakin, Jessica L., Jefferis, Valerie E., Cheng, Clara Michelle, Chartrand, Tanya L.·2003·Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
DOI 10.1023/a:1025389814290
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025389814290

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Chartrand, T. L., Cheng, C. M., & Jefferis, V. E. (2002). You're just a chameleon: The automatic nature and social significance of mimicry. In M. Jarymowicz & R. K. Ohme (Eds.), Natura automatyzmow (Nature of Automaticity, pp. 19–23). Warszawa: IPPAN & SWPS.
  2. Chartrand, T. L., & Jefferis, V. (in press). Consequences of automatic goal pursuit and the case of nonconscious mimicry. To appear in J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Responding to the social world: Implicit and explicit processes in social judgments and decisions. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  3. DePaulo, B. M., & Friedman, H. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 3–40). New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K., & van Knippenberg, A. (in press). Mimicry and pro-social behavior. Psychological Science.
  5. Williams, K. D., & Zadro, L. (2001). Ostracism: On being ignored, excluded, and rejected. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 21–53). London, Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L.
Affiliations
  • Drew University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Lakin, Jessica L.
ORCID
Chartrand, Tanya L.
Venue
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
145-162
ISSN
  • 0191-5886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3653
DOI
10.1023/a:1025389814290
OpenAlex
W1648167046
Cited by
960
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 53
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
chameleon effect, behavioral mimicry, affiliation, liking, rapport, social bonding, human evolution, nonverbal communication, evolutionary psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review