Cited by 357Polymer Surface Interaction Studiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBone Tissue Engineering Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of the Chemical Structure and the Surface Properties of Polymeric Biomaterials on Their Biocompatibility

Wang, You-Xiong, Robertson, John L., Spillman, William B., Claus, Richard O.·2004·Pharmaceutical Research

Abstract

Polymeric biomaterials have extensively been used in medicinal applications. However, factors that determine their biocompatibility are still not very clear. This article reviews various effects of the chemical structure and the surface properties of polymeric biomaterials on their biocompatibility, including protein adsorption, cell adhesion, cytotoxicity, blood compatibility, and tissue compatibility. Understanding these aspects of biocompatibility is important to the improvement of the biocompatibility of existing polymers and the design of new biocompatible polymers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:pham.0000036909.41843.18

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results were supposed to be affected by different mechanical loading by surface roughness, and besides chemical composition, also by resulting surface properties such as hydrophobicity, which are main predictors of protein adsorption and cell adhesion.

    “These results were supposed to be affected by different mechanical loading by the surface roughness, and besides the chemical composition of the material surface, also by the resulting surface properties, often expressed in terms of hydrophobicity, that are the main predictors of protein adsorption and, thus, cell adhesion [77-79].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. J. B. Park. Biomaterials. In J.D. Bronzino (ed.), Biomedical Engineering Handbook,CRC Press and IEEE Press, 1995, pp. 530–610.
  2. J. M. Schakenraad, H. I. Busscher, C. R. H. Wildevuur, and J. Arends. The influence of substratum surface free energy on spreading of various cell-types on polymers. Adv. Biomater. { vn6}: 263–268 (1986).
  3. J. Jagur-Grodzinski. Heterogeneous Modification of Polymers, Wiley, Chichester, 1997.
  4. A. S. Hoffman. J Appl Polym Sci. Appl Polym Symp { vn4vn2}:251–259 (1988).
  5. R.W.J. Bowers, S.A. Jones, P.W. Stratford, S.A. Charles, Polymeric surface coatings, US Patent 5,648,442 (1994).
  6. D. E. Chenoweth. In: E.F. Leonard, V.T. Turitto, and L. Vroman. Blood in Contacts with Natural and Artificial Surfaces, New York Academy of Science, New York, 1987, pp 307–313.
  7. L. Ruiz, D. S. Johnston, S. A. Makobliso, P. Aebischer, and H. J. Mathieu. Biomimetic coatings on silicon wafers: synthesis and characterization. In Mathieu (ed.), Ecasia '95 Proceedings, Chichester, 1996, pp 18–61.
  8. K. Ishihara, N. Shibata, and S. Tanaka. Y Iwasaki, T. Kurosaki, and N. Nakabayashi. Improved blood compatibility of segmented polyurethanes by polymeric additives having phospholipid polar group. II. Dispersion state of polymeric additive and protein adsorption on the surface. J. Biomed. Mater. { vn32}:401–408 (1996). · DOI
  9. P. Ferruti, S. Knobloch, E. Ranucci, E. Gianasi, and R. Duncan. A novel chemical modification of poly-L-lysine reducing toxicity while preserving cationic properties. Proc. Int. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. { vn24}:45–46 (1997).
  10. X. Chang and H. M. Burt. Diblock copolymers of poly(DLlactide)-block-methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) as micellar carrier of Taxol. Pharm. Res. { vn12}:S265-269 (1995).
  11. D. Fischer, T. Bieber, H. P. Elsasser, and T. Kissel. Polyethylenimine: synthesis and in vitro cytotoxicity of low molecular weight polycation for gene transfer. Eur. J. Cell Biol. { vn75}:108–112 (1998).
  12. D. M. Brunnette. The effect of implant surface topography on the behavior of cell. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants { vn3}:231–246 (1988).
  13. D. M. Brunnette. The effect of surface topography on cell migration and adhesion. In R.D. Ratner (ed.), Surface Characterization of Biomaterials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 203–217.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y.-X., Robertson, J. L., Spillman, W. B., & Claus, R. O.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Virginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, You-Xiong
Venue
Pharmaceutical Research
Published
2004-08
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1362-1373
ISSN
  • 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-904X
OpenAlex
W2113455936
Cited by
357
References
143
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
polymeric biomaterials, biocompatibility, molecular structure, surface properties, protein adsorption, cell adhesion, cytotoxicity, hemocompatibility, histocompatibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Humans, Materials Testing, Molecular Conformation, Molecular Weight, Polymers, Surface Properties, Molecular Structure, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review