Cited by 30Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The transdiagnostic model of worry: The mediating role of experiential avoidance

Akbari, Mehdi, Khanipour, Hamid·2018·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.011

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akbari, M., & Khanipour, H.
Affiliations
Kharazmi University (IR)
Corresponding author
Akbari, Mehdi
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
135
Pages
166-172
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883143471
Cited by
30
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
pathological worry, transdiagnostic model, experiential avoidance, intolerance of uncertainty, metacognitive beliefs, emotional schemas, acceptance and commitment therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, non-clinical population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review