CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Bicultural Phenomenon: The Interplay of Group Prototypicality and Cultural Identity Switching

Schindler, Simon, Reinhard, Marc-André, Knab, Martin, Stahlberg, Dagmar·2016·Social Psychology
DOI 10.1027/1864-9335/a000276
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract. Cross-cultural research has indicated that bicultural individuals switch their behavioral patterns according to situational cultural frames. Based on self-categorization theory and evidence that being prototypical for an ingroup can increase ingroup identification, we investigated the idea that when being prototypical for a specific culture, bicultural individuals switch their cultural identification toward the culture for which they are prototypical. According to previous findings, we additionally investigated the moderating role of perceived cultural compatibility. In this study, we manipulated cultural group prototypicality by giving immigrant Polish-German participants test performance feedback. As hypothesized, participants either showed increased identification with the German culture when the feedback rendered them prototypically German, or with the Polish culture when the feedback rendered them prototypically Polish. This effect was moderated by perceived cultural compatibility. Implications for a self-enhancement motive are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1864-9335/a000276

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People may conform to social norms when they are highly identified with the reference group, are personally uncertain, experience a threat to self-esteem, or to control.

    “On the contrary, people may conform to social norms when they are highly identified with the reference group (Masson & Fritsche, 2014; Reinhard et al., 2014; Schindler et al., 2016; Terry et al., 1999), are personally uncertain (Smith et al., 2007), experience a threat to self-esteem (vanDellen et al., 2011), or to control (Stollberg et al., 2017).”

    From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Schindler et al., 2016

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1002/9780470998458.ch18 · DOI
  2. Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0022022102033005005 · DOI
  5. Berry, J. W. (1988). Acculturation and psychological adaptation: Conceptual overview. In J. W. Berry & R. C. Annis (Eds.),Ethnic psychology: Research and practice with immigrants, refugees, native peoples, ethnic groups and sojourners(pp. 41–52). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  6. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01208.x · DOI
  7. Berry, J. W. & Sam, D. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Social behavior and applications(Vol. 3 pp. 291–319). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  8. Birman, D. (1994). Acculturation and human diversity in a multicultural society. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts & D. Birman (Eds.),Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series(pp. 261–284). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  9. 10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_9 · DOI
  10. Bruner J., 1990, Acts of meaning
  11. 10.1177/0022022106292081 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/00207599408246532 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hayes A. F., 2013, Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach
  16. 10.3758/BRM.41.3.924 · DOI
  17. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hogg, M. A. (2005). All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others: Social identity and marginal membership. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas & W. von Hippel (Eds.),The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying(pp. 243–261). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  19. Hogg, M. A. (2006). Social identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.),Contemporary social psychological theories(pp. 111–136). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  20. Hogg M. A., 1988, Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes
  21. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x · DOI
  23. 10.1521/soco.19.3.251.21473 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1509/jmkr.38.1.100.18835 · DOI
  26. Kermani N., 2009, Wer ist wir? Deutschland und seine Muslime
  27. 10.1080/00224540209603894 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.395 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1177/0022022196271008 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0146167292183006 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1080/10463283.2011.627187 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/a0015850 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/0003-066X.51.9.918 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1207/s15327795jra0701_2 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Raven J. C., 1998, Advanced progressive matrices
  36. 10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/1368430213507319 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.5539/ijps.v6n3p129 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.006 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.001 · DOI
  41. Shore B., 1996, Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning, 10.1093/oso/9780195095975.001.0001 · DOI
  42. Stahlberg D., 2001, European Bulletin of Social Psychology, 1, 15
  43. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1959.tb00677.x · DOI
  44. 10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.),The social psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  46. 10.1177/0022022100031003002 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Turner J. C., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory
  48. 10.1016/0147-1767(94)90036-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schindler, S., Reinhard, M.-A., Knab, M., & Stahlberg, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • University of Mannheim (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Social Psychology
Publisher
Hogrefe Publishing Group
Published
2016-09
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
233-243
ISSN
  • 1864-9335 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2590
DOI
10.1027/1864-9335/a000276
OpenAlex
W2529611938
Cited by
16
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
biculturalism, cultural identification, self-categorization theory, ingroup identification, self-enhancement motive, immigrant identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review