Cited by 38Tree-ring climate responsesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Swedish tree rings provide new evidence in support of a major, widespread environmental disruption in 1628 BC

Open access
Grudd, Håkan, Briffa, Keith R., Gunnarson, Björn E., Linderholm, Hans W.·2000·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Pine trees, recovered from a peat bog in south‐central Sweden, are used to develop a continuous, but “floating”, 200‐year tree‐ring chronology. By wiggle matching high‐precision 14 C determinations against the radiocarbon calibration curve, the chronology is positioned at 1695–1496 BC with an uncertainty of ±65 years. One major event, denoted by four consecutive years with extremely narrow rings, indicative of highly unfavourable local tree‐growth conditions, occurred in the time window represented by the chronology. This growth depression is dated to 1637 BC (±65) and may be tentatively ascribed to the same phenomenon that caused frost damage in trees in California and a growth depression in European oak in 1628/27 BC, hence providing new evidence of a more northerly area of influence of this widespread phenomenon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999gl010852

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All the scientific dating evidence could indicate a likely date for the Santorini/Thera eruption in the later 17th century BCE potentially compatible with the 1628-1626 BCE range.

    “Since we may now remove the Porsuk tree-ring growth anomaly from this discussion (see above), all the scientific dating evidence could therefore indicate a likely date for the Santorini/Thera eruption in the later 17th century BCE potentially compatible with the 1628–1626 BCE range (e.g. [66, 68, 69, 78–81, 89–92]).”

    From Integrated Tree-Ring-Radiocarbon High-Resolution Timeframe to Resolve Earlier Second Millennium BCE Mesopotamian Chronology (2016) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Results (page not specified in our copy) place a major environmental disruption at 1628/27 BCE and say a 1628 BCE volcanic eruption may have been Santorini. They also caution that linking tree-ring and ice-core signals to a specific volcano is problematic. The paper therefore supports compatibility with that date, but not the broader claim that all scientific dating evidence points to a likely date for the Santorini eruption; it does not establish the effect of removing the Porsuk anomaly. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A range of tree-ring evidence around the northern hemisphere indicates unusual growth anomalies from 1628-1626 BCE plausibly associated with the cooling effects of a major volcanic eruption.

    “a period when (from 1628–1626 BCE) a range of tree-ring evidence around the northern hemisphere indicates unusual growth anomalies plausibly associated with the cooling effects of a major volcanic eruption (e.g. [78–81]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hardy, D.A., and A.C. Renfrew (Eds.), Theta and the Aegean World III, The Thera Foundation, London, 1990.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grudd, H., Briffa, K. R., Gunnarson, B. E., & Linderholm, H. W.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2000-09-15
Volume
27
Issue
18
Pages
2957-2960
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2061083171
Cited by
38
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
tree-ring chronology, pine, peat bog, radiocarbon wiggle-matching, frost damage, European oak, Late Bronze Age, paleoclimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review