The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural uplift beneath the Chicxulub impact structure
Abstract
Models of the central structure of large impact craters are poorly constrained, partly because of the lack of well‐preserved terrestrial examples, and partly because of the extreme nature of impact events. Even large impact craters take only a few minutes to form, during which time rocks from the deep crust move upward many kilometers, interacting with impact melts and breccias before settling to their final position. We construct a new model of central uplift beneath the Chicxulub crater, based upon a well‐constrained 3‐D velocity model, obtained by jointly inverting seismic traveltime and gravity data. The input tomographic data set has good resolution, and many rays cross the central uplift in many directions. We use laboratory measurements to convert between velocity and density. Our velocity model possesses a high‐velocity zone near the crater center, and velocity gradually decreases outside this zone. We use regional refraction data to interpret these velocities in terms of a broad 80‐km‐wide zone of structural uplift, in which the central rocks originate from the lower crust, and the surrounding rocks from the midcrust and upper crust. This is in contrast with previous models in which the zone of central uplift is either 40–50 km or 150 km wide. Our interpretation is consistent with scaling laws, Yucatán basement lithology, other velocity data, observations at similar‐sized terrestrial craters, and dynamic modeling of peak ring formation. Our model of the uplift at Chicxulub can be used to help distinguish between competing models of effective target strength in numerical models of crater formation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The interpretation of the reflection seismic data and the interpretation that the seismic and gravity data at Chicxulub can be reconciled to indicate that the structural uplift in the crater floor extends out to the inner topographic ring are generally consistent with the Collins et al. (2002) type of model.
“The interpretation of the reflection seismic data (Morgan et al. 2000) and the interpretation that the seismic and gravity data at Chicxulub can be reconciled to indicate that the structural uplift in the crater floor extends out to the inner topographic ring are generally consistent with this type of model (Vermeesch and Morgan 2008).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Vermeesch and Morgan 2008
Citations
Cites
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1029/JZ065i004p01083 · DOI
- 10.1190/1.1444455 · DOI
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<227:COTLCC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001JB000337 · DOI
- 10.1006/icar.2002.6822 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.032 · DOI
- Dressler B. O., 1984, The Geology and Ore deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 97
- 10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00005-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-9201(95)03022-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Gibson R. L., 2001, The Vredefort Impact Structure, South Africa: The Scientific Evidence and a Two‐Day Excursion Guide, Mem. 92
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0787:TMSOAI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- Grieve R. A. F., 2006, Impact Structures in Canada
- Grieve R. A. F., 1996, The signature of terrestrial impact craters, AGSO J. Aust. Geol. Geophys., 16, 399
- 10.1038/ngeo103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0867:CCAPCT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.140.01.12 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11208-005-0051-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Ivanov B. A., 1982, Formation of the central uplift in meteoritic craters (in Russian), Meteoritika, 40, 67
- James R. S., 1992, International Conference on Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution, Abstracts, LPI Contrib. 790
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00299.x · DOI
- 10.1029/95JE01768 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00300.x · DOI · Paper page
- Lopez‐Ramos E., 1979, Geologia de Mexico
- McCarthy T. S., 1990, Geological studies related to the origin of the Witwatersrand basin and its mineralization: An introduction and a strategy for research and exploration, S. Afr. J. Geol., 93, 1
- 10.1029/JB084iB13p07513 · DOI
- Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process
- Menke W. H., 1991, Geophysical Theory
- 10.1029/97JB02122 · DOI
- 10.1038/37291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00307-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00143-9 · DOI
- 10.1029/1998JE000596 · DOI
- 10.1029/2000JB900222 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00140.x · DOI · Paper page
- Sharpton V. L., 1996, The Cretaceous‐Tertiary Event and Other Catastrophes in Earth History, 55
- 10.1038/373130a0 · DOI · Paper page
- Styles E.(2006) Chicxulub: An analysis of new gravity data Masters thesis 122 pp. Imperial College London UK.
- Vermeesch P. M.(2006) Geophysical study of the Chicxulub impact crater Ph.D. thesis 418 pp. Imperial College London UK.
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb01127.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0-8137-2339-6.19 · DOI
- 10.1130/0-8137-2384-1.67 · DOI
- Yhap C.(2007) Stratigraphic uplift beneath the Chicxulub impact crater: Resolution testing M.Sci. thesis Imperial College London UK.
- 10.1029/97JB03536 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vermeesch, P. M., & Morgan, J. V.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences University of Texas Austin Texas USA
- Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London UK
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- B7
- ISSN
- 0148-0227
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review