Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural uplift beneath the Chicxulub impact structure

Vermeesch, Peggy M., Morgan, Joanna V.·2008·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Models of the central structure of large impact craters are poorly constrained, partly because of the lack of well‐preserved terrestrial examples, and partly because of the extreme nature of impact events. Even large impact craters take only a few minutes to form, during which time rocks from the deep crust move upward many kilometers, interacting with impact melts and breccias before settling to their final position. We construct a new model of central uplift beneath the Chicxulub crater, based upon a well‐constrained 3‐D velocity model, obtained by jointly inverting seismic traveltime and gravity data. The input tomographic data set has good resolution, and many rays cross the central uplift in many directions. We use laboratory measurements to convert between velocity and density. Our velocity model possesses a high‐velocity zone near the crater center, and velocity gradually decreases outside this zone. We use regional refraction data to interpret these velocities in terms of a broad 80‐km‐wide zone of structural uplift, in which the central rocks originate from the lower crust, and the surrounding rocks from the midcrust and upper crust. This is in contrast with previous models in which the zone of central uplift is either 40–50 km or 150 km wide. Our interpretation is consistent with scaling laws, Yucatán basement lithology, other velocity data, observations at similar‐sized terrestrial craters, and dynamic modeling of peak ring formation. Our model of the uplift at Chicxulub can be used to help distinguish between competing models of effective target strength in numerical models of crater formation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007jb005393

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interpretation of the reflection seismic data and the interpretation that the seismic and gravity data at Chicxulub can be reconciled to indicate that the structural uplift in the crater floor extends out to the inner topographic ring are generally consistent with the Collins et al. (2002) type of model.

    “The interpretation of the reflection seismic data (Morgan et al. 2000) and the interpretation that the seismic and gravity data at Chicxulub can be reconciled to indicate that the structural uplift in the crater floor extends out to the inner topographic ring are generally consistent with this type of model (Vermeesch and Morgan 2008).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1029/JZ065i004p01083 · DOI
  2. 10.1190/1.1444455 · DOI
  3. 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<227:COTLCC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  4. 10.1029/2001JB000337 · DOI
  5. 10.1006/icar.2002.6822 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.032 · DOI
  7. Dressler B. O., 1984, The Geology and Ore deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 97
  8. 10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00005-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0031-9201(95)03022-6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gibson R. L., 2001, The Vredefort Impact Structure, South Africa: The Scientific Evidence and a Two‐Day Excursion Guide, Mem. 92
  11. 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0787:TMSOAI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  12. Grieve R. A. F., 2006, Impact Structures in Canada
  13. Grieve R. A. F., 1996, The signature of terrestrial impact craters, AGSO J. Aust. Geol. Geophys., 16, 399
  14. 10.1038/ngeo103 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0867:CCAPCT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.140.01.12 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/s11208-005-0051-0 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ivanov B. A., 1982, Formation of the central uplift in meteoritic craters (in Russian), Meteoritika, 40, 67
  19. James R. S., 1992, International Conference on Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution, Abstracts, LPI Contrib. 790
  20. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00299.x · DOI
  21. 10.1029/95JE01768 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00300.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lopez‐Ramos E., 1979, Geologia de Mexico
  24. McCarthy T. S., 1990, Geological studies related to the origin of the Witwatersrand basin and its mineralization: An introduction and a strategy for research and exploration, S. Afr. J. Geol., 93, 1
  25. 10.1029/JB084iB13p07513 · DOI
  26. Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process
  27. Menke W. H., 1991, Geophysical Theory
  28. 10.1029/97JB02122 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/37291 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00307-1 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00143-9 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/1998JE000596 · DOI
  33. 10.1029/2000JB900222 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00140.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sharpton V. L., 1996, The Cretaceous‐Tertiary Event and Other Catastrophes in Earth History, 55
  36. 10.1038/373130a0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Styles E.(2006) Chicxulub: An analysis of new gravity data Masters thesis 122 pp. Imperial College London UK.
  38. Vermeesch P. M.(2006) Geophysical study of the Chicxulub impact crater Ph.D. thesis 418 pp. Imperial College London UK.
  39. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb01127.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1130/0-8137-2339-6.19 · DOI
  41. 10.1130/0-8137-2384-1.67 · DOI
  42. Yhap C.(2007) Stratigraphic uplift beneath the Chicxulub impact crater: Resolution testing M.Sci. thesis Imperial College London UK.
  43. 10.1029/97JB03536 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vermeesch, P. M., & Morgan, J. V.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences University of Texas Austin Texas USA
  • Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London UK
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2008-07
Volume
113
Issue
B7
ISSN
0148-0227
Cited by
35
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review