Cited by 97Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchRespiratory Support and MechanismsSleep and related disorders

Two months auto-adjusting versus conventional nCPAP for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

Open access
Teschler, H, Wessendorf, T.e, Farhat, A.a, Konietzko, N, Berthon-Jones, M.·2000·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Autoadjusting nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) greatly reduces the apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI), and affords a significant reduction in median pressure (P50) compared-with manually titrated conventional nasal CPAP. The aim of the present study was to test whether these benefits were maintained in the medium term at home, in a double-blind crossover study. Ten sequential subjects (mean AHI 52.9 x h(-1)) were enrolled. After a manual titration, subjects were randomly allocated to 2 months autoadjusting nasal CPAP (AutoSet), followed by 2 months with the AutoSet device in fixed pressure mode at the manually titrated pressure, or vice versa. The machine-scored AHI, P50, and median leak were recorded on 12 nights in each arm, and averaged. Mean+/-SEM AHI was 4.0+/-0.3 x h(-1) in auto mode, and 3.7+/-0.3 x h(-1) in manual mode (NS). Mean+/-SEM P50 was 7.2+/-0.4 cmH2O auto, 9.4+/-0.6 cmH2O manual, average reduction 23+/-4% (p<0.0001). Auto "recommended" pressure was (mean+/-SEM) 10.1+/-0.5 cmH2O (p=0.04 with respect to manual) and peak pressure typically 1 cmH2O higher. Median (+/-SEM) leak was 0.181+/-0.006 L x s(-1) auto (and uncorrelated with AHI or pressure), 0.20+/-0.006 L x s(-1) manual (p=0.003). Compliance was 6.3+/-0.4 h in auto mode and 6.1+/-0.5 h in fixed mode (NS). Apnoea/hypopnoea index during 2 months of home autoadjusting nasal continuous positive airway pressure is comparable to that during conventionally titrated fixed pressure continuous positive airway pressure, while affording a 23% reduction in median pressure but no increase in compliance. Leak did not importantly affect autoadjustment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.01503.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teschler, H., Wessendorf, T. E., Farhat, A. A., Konietzko, N., & Berthon-Jones, M.
Affiliations
Ruhrlandklinik (DE)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2000-06
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
990
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2131352837
Cited by
97
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
nasal continuous positive airway pressure, obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP titration, apnea-hypopnea index, CPAP adherence, air leakage
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Hypoxia, Double-Blind Method, Home Nursing, Humans, Lung Compliance, Male, Masks, Middle Aged, Nose, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review