Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so?

Gregory, W. Larry, Cialdini, Robert B., Carpenter, Kathleen M.·1982·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

A series of studies was conducted to determine the viability of a scenario pro-cedure as a compliance technique. In four experiments, subjects who, through the use of a structured scenario, were led to imagine themselves experiencing certain events came to believe more strongly that the events would befall them. This promotive effect of the scenario procedure on probability or likelihood es-timates occurred for both positive events (e.g., winning a contest) and negative events (e.g., being arrested for a crime) and occurred in both laboratory and field contexts. Furthermore, and crucial to its relevance for compliance, the scenario procedure was shown to influence not bnly probability judgments but also behavior. Homeowners who imagined themselves utilizing a cable television service were subsequently more likely to subscribe to such a service when re-quested to do so weeks later. Finally, it was determined that the effect of struc-tured scenarios on compliance is not due to additional information provided by the scenario. Instead, an interpretation based on the availability heuristic is favored.

Cites (3)

  1. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1973 · Cognitive Psychology
  2. Self-Perception Theory
    Bem, Daryl J. · 1972 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  3. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.
    Orne, Martin T. · 1962 · American Psychologist

Show all 3 references

Cited by (37)

  1. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1983 · Psychological Review
  2. Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
    Strack, Fritz, Deutsch, Roland · 2004 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  3. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure
    Mischel, Walter, Shoda, Yuichi · 1995 · Psychological Review
  4. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
    Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
  5. The Affect Heuristic
    Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases

See all 578

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.43.1.89
The paper
Gregory, W. L., Cialdini, R. B., & Carpenter, K. M. (1982). Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.43.1.89

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.