Expectancy × value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction.

James Y. Shah, Edward Tory Higgins·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The authors propose that a promotion focus involves construal of achievement goals as aspirations whose attainment brings accomplishment. Commitment to these accomplishment goals is characterized by attempts to attain the highest expected utility. In contrast, a prevention focus involves construal of achievement goals as responsibilities whose attainment brings security. Commitment to these security goals is characterized by doing what is necessary. The different nature of commitment to accomplishment goals versus security goals is predicted to influence the interactive effect of goal expectancy and goal value on goal commitment, as evident in both task performance and decision making. Four studies found that the classic positive interactive effect of expectancy and value on goal commitment increases with a promotion focus and decreases with a prevention focus.

Cites (2)

  1. Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
    Rever, George W. · 1972 · Psychosomatic Medicine
  2. Stated expectations as functions of probability and desirability of outcomes
    IRWIN, FRANCIS W. · 1953 · Journal of Personality

Show all 2 references

Cited by (18)

  1. Nature and Operation of Attitudes
    Ajzen, Icek · 2001 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle
    Higgins, E. Tory · 1998 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  3. A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships
    Feeney, Brooke C., Collins, Nancy L. · 2015 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  4. Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work
    Brockner, Joel, Higgins, E.Tory · 2001 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  5. Self-regulation of goal-setting: turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals
    Oettingen, Gabriele, Pak, Hyeon-ju, Schnetter, Karoline · 2001 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 334

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expectancy × value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.73.3.447
The paper
Shah, J. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy × value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.3.447

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.