Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.
Abstract
On the basis of fairness heuristic theory, it is argued in this article that people especially need fairness when they are reminded about aspects of their lives that make them uncertain. It is therefore proposed that thinking about uncertainty should make fairness a more important issue to people. The findings of 3 experiments support this line of reasoning: Asking (vs. not asking) participants 2 questions that solicited their thoughts and feelings of being uncertain led to stronger effects of perceived procedural fairness on participants' affective reactions toward the way they were treated. It is argued that these findings suggest that fairness matters to people especially when they are trying to deal with things that make them uncertain. An implication of the current findings therefore may be that fairness is important to people because it gives them an opportunity to manage uncertain aspects of their lives.
Cites (35)
- Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Watson, David, Clark, Lee Anna, Tellegen, Auke · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Advances In Experimental Social Psychology2022 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- The Handbook of Social PsychologyGravatt, Arthur E., Lindzey, G., Aronson, F. · 1969 · The Family Coordinator
- The Social Psychology of Procedural JusticeLind, E. Allan, Tyler, Tom R. · 1988 · Critical Issues in Social Justice
- A Relational Model of Authority in GroupsTyler, Tom R., Lind, E. Allan · 1992 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Organizational Justice and Human Resource ManagementFolger, Robert, Cropanzano, Russell · 1998 · Sage eBooks
- Handbook of Social PsychologyYoung, Kimball · 2016 · Routledge eBooks
- Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: empirical assessments and conceptual refinementsGreenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon, Pyszczynski, Tom · 1997 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theoryPyszczynski, Tom, Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon · 1999 · Psychological Review
- An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.Joel Brockner, Batia Mishan Wiesenfeld · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (55)
- Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives.Colquitt, Jason A., Scott, Brent A., Rodell, Jessica B., Long, David M., Zapata, Cindy P., Conlon, Donald E., Wesson, Michael J. · 2013 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Why Do People Need Self-Esteem? A Theoretical and Empirical Review.Pyszczynski, Tom, Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon, Arndt, Jamie, Schimel, Jeff · 2004 · Psychological Bulletin
- Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgmentsvan den Bos, Kees, Lind, E. Allan · 2002 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Experimental Research on Just-World Theory: Problems, Developments, and Future Challenges.Hafer, Carolyn L., Bègue, Laurent · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
- Uncertainty During Organizational Change: Types, Consequences, and Management StrategiesBordia, Prashant, Hobman, Elizabeth, Jones, Elizabeth, Gallois, Cindy, Callan, Victor J. · 2004 · Journal of Business and Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.931
- The paper
- van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.