From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology.
Abstract
The study of scientific discovery—where do new ideas come from?—has long been denigrated by philosophers as irrelevant to analyzing the growth of scientific knowledge. In particular, little is known about how cognitive theories are discovered, and neither the classical accounts of discovery as either probabilistic induction (e.g., Reichenbach, 1938) or lucky guesses (e.g., Popper, 1959), nor the stock anecdotes about sudden “eureka ” moments deepen the insight into discovery. A heuristics approach is taken in this review, where heuristics are understood as strategies of discovery less general than a supposed unique logic of discovery but more general than lucky guesses. This article deals with how scientists’ tools shape theories of mind, in particular with how methods of statistical inference have turned into metaphors of mind. The tools-to-theories heuristic explains the emergence of a broad range of cognitive theories, from the cognitive revolution of the 1960s up to the present, and it can be used to detect both limitations and new lines of development in current cognitive theories that investigate the mind as an “intuitive statistician.” Scientific inquiry can be viewed as “an ocean, continuous everywhere and without a break or division ” (Leibniz, 1690/1951, p. 73). Hans Reichenbach (1938) nonetheless divided this ocean into two great seas, the context of discovery and the context of justification. Philosophers, logicians,
Cites (10)
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1974 · Science
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesTversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
- On the psychology of prediction.Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos · 1973 · Psychological Review
- Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural ScienceHacking, Ian · 1983
- Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and ChoiceEinhorn, H J, Hogarth, R M · 1981 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidenceGigerenzer, Gerd, Hoffrage, Ulrich, Kleinbölting, Heinz · 1991 · Psychological Review
- A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes.Ajzen, Icek, Fishbein, Martin · 1975 · Psychological Bulletin
- Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of ProbabilityNeyman, J. · 1937 · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice VersaSterling, Theodore D. · 1959 · Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?Sedlmeier, Peter, Gigerenzer, Gerd · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (28)
- Heuristic decision makingGigerenzer, Gerd, Gaissmaier, Wolfgang · 2011 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.Gigerenzer, Gerd, Goldstein, Daniel G. · 1996 · Psychological Review
- Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- Entrepreneurial Action And The Role Of Uncertainty In The Theory Of The EntrepreneurMcMullen, Jeffery S., Shepherd, Dean A. · 2006 · Academy of Management Review
- The Affect HeuristicSlovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.98.2.254
- The paper
- Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.98.2.254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.