Cited by 1,691Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and Choice

Einhorn, H J, Hogarth, R M·1981·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

A revolution in the science of emotion has emerged in recent decades, with the potential to create a paradigm shift in decision theories. The research reveals that emotions constitute potent, pervasive, predictable, sometimes harmful and sometimes ...Read More

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M.
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
1981-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
53-88
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2178782964
Cited by
1,691
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 38
FWCI
45.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Keywords
behavioral decision theory, judgment, choice, emotions, decision-making, emotional decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review