Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces.

Searcy, Jean H., Bartlett, James C.·1996·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

This study compared effects of inversion on perceptual processing of faces with distorted components (eyes and mouths) and faces distorted by altering spatial relations between components. In a rating task, participants inversion reduced the rated grotesqueness of spatially distorted faces but not that of faces with altered components. In a comparison task, pairs of faces were shown side by side; participants judged whether they were identical or different. Inversion greatly reduced the rate at which participants responded within 3 s to pairs that differed spatially, but not pairs that differed componentially. Also, latencies for detecting spatial differences were lengthened by inversion more than latencies for detecting componential differences. Results support the hypothesis that inversion impairs encoding of spatial-relational information more than, or instead of, componential information, depending on the task.

Cites (30)

  1. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
    Lyle E. Bourne · 1977
  2. Cognition and Categorization
    Rosch, Eleanor, Lloyd, Barbara B. · 2024 · Routledge eBooks
  3. Looking at upside-down faces.
    Yin, Robert K. · 1969 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
  4. Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition
    Tanaka, James W., Farah, Martha J. · 1993 · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
  5. Memory and cognition
    Walter Kintsch · 1977 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  6. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
    Rhea Diamond, Susan E. Carey · 1986 · Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  7. A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition
    Valentine, Tim · 1991 · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
  8. Configurational Information in Face Perception
    Young, Andrew W, Hellawell, Deborah, Hay, Dennis C · 1987 · Perception
  9. CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition.
    John Morton, Mark Henry Johnson · 1991 · Psychological Review
  10. Upside‐down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition
    Valentine, Tim · 1988 · British Journal of Psychology

Show all 30 references

Cited by (14)

  1. The many faces of configural processing
    Maurer, Daphne, Grand, Richard Le, Mondloch, Catherine J. · 2002 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  2. Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms
    Adolphs, Ralph · 2002 · Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews
  3. Frontiers in Psychology
    2016
  4. Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs
    Itier, Roxane J., Taylor, Margot J. · 2002 · NeuroImage
  5. Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity
    Yonelinas, Andrew P. · 2001 · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

See all 384

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.22.4.904
The paper
Searcy, J. H., & Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.22.4.904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.