Cited by 547Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity

Open access
Yonelinas, Andrew P.·2001·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The examination of recognition memory confidence judgements indicates that there are two separate components or processes underlying episodic memory. A model that accounts for these results is described in which a recollection process and a familiarity process are assumed to contribute to recognition memory performance. Recollection is assumed to reflect a threshold process whereby qualitative information about the study event is retrieved, whereas familiarity reflects a classical signal-detection process whereby items exceeding a familiarity response criterion are accepted as having been studied. Evidence from cognitive, neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies indicate that the model is in agreement with the existing recognition results, and indicate that recollection and familiarity are behaviourally, neurally and phenomenologically distinct memory retrieval processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2001.0939

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Familiarity-based recognition taps to a greater extent implicit components of memories than recollection.

    “Improving the effects of early SWS-rich sleep on declarative memory appeared to be overall more consistent with free (or cued) recall measures than with recognition measures of memory (265, 326, 667, 966; see Ref. 297, for a review), possibly reflecting that unlike recollection, familiarity based recognition taps to a greater extent implicit components of these memories (1343,1344).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1343]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yonelinas, A. P.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Yonelinas, Andrew P.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2001-09-29
Volume
356
Issue
1413
Pages
1363-1374
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2032338157
Cited by
547
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 30
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 59352, R01MH059352)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, recollection, familiarity, recognition memory, confidence judgments, signal detection theory, memory retrieval, memory models, neuropsychology of memory, neuroimaging of memory
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Mental Recall, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review