Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7,766Education, Achievement, and GiftednessHuman Behavior and MotivationBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.

Locke, Edwin A., Latham, Gary P.·2002·American Psychologist
DOI 10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors summarize 35 years of empirical research on goal-setting theory, describing the core findings of the theory, the mechanisms by which goals operate, moderators of goal effects, the relation of goals and satisfaction, and the role of goals as mediators of incentives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

7 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cites

Show all 131 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Atkinson, 1958, Towards experimental analysis of human motivation in terms of motives, expectancies and incentives., 288
  2. Bandura, 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory.
  3. Howard, 1988, Managerial lives in transition.
  4. Kanfer, 1970, Self-regulation: Research, issues and speculation., 178
  5. Locke, 1997, The motivation to work: What we know., Vol. 10, 375
  6. Locke, 1997, Participation in decision-making: An information exchange perspective., Vol. 15, XXX
  7. Ryan, 1970, Intentional behavior.
  8. Vroom, 1964, The motivation to work.
  9. Wood, 1990, Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks., Vol. 12, 73

Cited by

Items 5,901–6,000 of 6,066

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
ORCID
Venue
American Psychologist
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2002-09
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
705-717
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
DOI
10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705
OpenAlex
W4237356565
Cited by
7,766
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 527 · 2025: 509 · 2024: 464 · 2023: 511 · 2022: 428 · 2021: 456 · 2020: 540 · 2019: 467 · 2018: 460 · 2017: 421 · 2016: 395 · 2015: 408 · 2014: 370 · 2013: 313 · 2012: 333
FWCI
59.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
goal setting, task motivation, motivation theories, goal difficulty, goal specificity, feedback, task difficulty
MeSH terms
Goals, Humans, Motivation, Psychological Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.