Cited by 239Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Insomniacs’ perceptions of cognitive versus somatic determinants of sleep disturbance

Lichstein, Kenneth L., Rosenthal, Ted L.·1980·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.89.1.105

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lichstein, K. L., & Rosenthal, T. L.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1980
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
105-107
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2037727848
Cited by
239
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
insomnia, sleep disorders, cognitive factors, patient perspectives
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Cognition, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Psychophysiologic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review