Cited by 209Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Rumination predicts longer sleep onset latency after an acute psychosocial stressor

Zoccola, Peggy M., Dickerson, Sally S., Lam, Suman·2009·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rumination has been linked to self-reported sleep quality. However, whether rumination is related to an objective sleep parameter has not been tested. This study examined whether rumination predicts sleep onset latency (SOL) on the night after an acute psychosocial stressor. We hypothesized that those who ruminate (assessed with both trait and stressor-specific measures) would have longer SOL (assessed with objective and subjective methods). METHODS: Seventy participants delivered a 5-minute speech in front of an evaluative panel during an afternoon laboratory session. Trait rumination was assessed before the stressor. Stressor-specific rumination was captured with the frequency of task-related thoughts participants experienced during a 10-minute rest period after the stressor. Participants wore actigraphs on their wrists on the night after the laboratory session to measure objective sleep onset latency (SOL-O). Subjective sleep onset latency was estimated by participants on the subsequent morning. RESULTS: Consistent with hypotheses, trait and stressor-specific rumination predicted longer SOL-O and subjective sleep onset latency, respectively. In addition, trait and stressor-specific rumination interacted to predict longer SOL-O. SOL-O was longest among those who engaged in more stressor-specific rumination and had greater trait rumination scores. Neither rumination measure was related to sleep duration or wakefulness after sleep onset. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study are consistent with previous research linking rumination to subjective sleep quality. The results also suggest that post-stressor ruminative thought may predict delayed sleep onset for those with a propensity for rumination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0b013e3181ae58e8

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zoccola, P. M., Dickerson, S. S., & Lam, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Zoccola, Peggy M.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2009-09
Volume
71
Issue
7
Pages
771-775
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010137324
Cited by
209
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
rumination, sleep latency, acute psychosocial stress, trait rumination, sleep quality, speech stressor, actigraphy
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Cognition, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Speech, Stress, Psychological, Thinking, Wakefulness, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review