The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact?
Abstract
Une reanalyse factorielle des donnees de Spector (1987) met a l'epreuve la validite de sa conclusion critique par rapport a la realite des variances des methodes dans un type de recherche sur les organisations
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, variance partitioning showed that common method variance (CMV) was only 3.73 % of the variance in the model in Study 1a and only 17.6 % in Study 1b (below the criteria of 25 %), indicating that CMV is not a critical concern in either study (Williams et al., 1989).”
From Work hard or play hard: the effect of leisure crafting on opportunity recognition and venture performance (2023) · cites this paper as Williams et al., 1989
Citations
Cites
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey
Spector, P. E. (1985) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00929796 · Cited by 2,188
Kenny, D. A. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,376
Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices
Peter, J. P. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150948 · Cited by 1,189
Book Review: Causal Models in Marketing
Phillips, L., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1980) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251239 · Cited by 1,103
Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data
Widaman, K. F. (1985) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168500900101 · Cited by 1,037
Spector, P. E. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.438 · Cited by 956
Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D., & Magidson, J. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 826
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
Rating well-being and distress
Rafanelli, C., Park, S. K., Ruini, C., Ottolini, F., Cazzaro, M., & Fava, G. A. (2000) · Stress Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1700(200001)16:1
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 462-468
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W1989362746
- Cited by
- 1,616
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 106 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Keywords
- method variance, self-reported affect, job perception, reanalysis, factor analysis, measurement validity, organizational analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
