A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.
Abstract
Meta-analytic techniques were used to examine level of analysis and interdependence as moderators of observed relationships between task-specific team-efficacy, generalized potency, and performance. Sixty-seven empirical studies yielding 256 effect sizes were identified and meta-analyzed. Results demonstrated that relationships are moderated by level of analysis. Effect sizes were stronger at the team level (p = .39) than at the individual level (p = .20). At the team level, both team-efficacy and potency had positive relationships with performance (ps = .41 and .37, respectively). Interdependence significantly moderated the relationship between team-efficacy and performance, but not between potency and performance. The relationship between team-efficacy and performance was stronger when interdependence was high (p = .45) than when it was low (p = .34).
Cites (9)
- Self-efficacy: The exercise of controlBandura, Albert, Freeman, W. H., Lightsey, Richard · 1999 · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Self-efficacy mechanism in human agencyBandura, Albert · 1982 · American Psychologist
- Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work TeamsEdmondson, Amy · 1999 · Administrative Science Quarterly
- A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflictJehn, Karen A. · 1995 · Administrative Science Quarterly
- Methods of Meta-AnalysisHunter, John, Schmidt, Frank · 2004
- Determinants of Coordination Modes within OrganizationsVen, Andrew H. Van De, Delbecq, Andre L., Koenig, Richard · 1976 · American Sociological Review
- Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysisKlein, Katherine J., Dansereau, Fred, Hall, Rosalie J. · 1994 · The Academy of Management Review
- Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource managementGist, Marilyn E. · 1987 · The Academy of Management Review
- EAST MEETS WEST MEETS MIDEAST: FURTHER EXPLORATIONS OF COLLECTIVISTIC AND INDIVIDUALISTIC WORK GROUPS.Earley, P. C. · 1993 · Academy of Management Journal
Cited by (34)
- CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META‐ANALYSIS OF PERSON–JOB, PERSON–ORGANIZATION, PERSON–GROUP, AND PERSON–SUPERVISOR FITKRISTOF‐BROWN, AMY L., ZIMMERMAN, RYAN D., JOHNSON, ERIN C. · 2005 · Personnel Psychology
- Toward a Psychology of Human AgencyBandura, Albert · 2006 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects RevisitedBandura, Albert, Locke, Edwin A. · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and TeamsKozlowski, Steve W.J., Ilgen, Daniel R. · 2006 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI ModelsIlgen, Daniel R., Hollenbeck, John R., Johnson, Michael, Jundt, Dustin · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.87.5.819
- The paper
- Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.5.819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.