The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women.
Abstract
To date there have been no studies of how both sex and ethnicity might affect the incidence of both sexual and ethnic harassment at work. This article represents an effort to fill this gap. Data from employees at 5 organizations were used to test whether minority women are subject to double jeopardy at work, experiencing the most harassment because they are both women and members of a minority group. The results supported this prediction. Women experienced more sexual harassment than men, minorities experienced more ethnic harassment than Whites, and minority women experienced more harassment overall than majority men, minority men, and majority women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Regression Analysis of Count Data
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013567 · Cited by 6,640
Rudman, L. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629 · Cited by 1,511
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066 · Cited by 1,501
Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616 · Cited by 697
THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHICANA FEMINIST DISCOURSE, 1970-1980
GARCIA, A. M. (1989) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124389003002004 · Cited by 203
Cited by
New Generation, Great Expectations: A Field Study of the Millennial Generation
Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4 · Cited by 1,133
Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes.
Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95 · Cited by 904
Selective Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations: Evidence and Impact
Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311418835 · Cited by 573
Harassment Based on Sex: Protecting Social Status in the Context of Gender Hierarchy
Berdahl, J. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351879 · Cited by 531
Self-citationPast, Present and Future Research on Multiple Identities: Toward an Intrapersonal Network Approach
Lakshmi Ramarajan, B. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.912379 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 426-436
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2070344560
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 35.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426
- The paper
- Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.