The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality and substance use disorders: A prospective study.
Abstract
The personality systems of Cloninger (as measured by the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire [TPQ]) and Eysenck (as measured by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire [EPQ]) both have been linked to substance use and abuse. The current study examined the predictive utility of both systems for substance use disorder (SUD) diagnoses, both cross-sectionally and prospectively. Participants (N = 489 at baseline) completed the EPQ and TPQ and were assessed via structured diagnostic interview at baseline and 6 years later (N = 457 at follow-up). Both the EPQ and TPQ scales demonstrated bivariate cross-sectional and prospective associations with SUDs. Within each system, those dimensions marking a broad impulsive sensation-seeking or behavioral disinhibition trait were the best predictors prospectively, although the 2 systems were differentially sensitive to specific diagnoses. These relations remained significant even with autoregressivity, other concurrent SUD diagnoses, and multiple personality dimensions statistically controlled.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, disinhibition has been linked to impulsive substance use [15], while negative affectivity may contribute to emotion-driven consumption [16].”
From The link of adverse childhood experiences and attachment to maladaptive personality traits in adults diagnosed with substance use disorder (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed
Cooper, A. M., & Michels, R. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.1.128 · Cited by 7,419
Personality Structure: Emergence Of The 5-Factor Model
Digman, J. M. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 · Cited by 6,731
An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216 · Cited by 6,652
A psychobiological model of temperament and character
Cloninger, C. R. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008 · Cited by 5,458
Drake, M. M. (1988) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.42.10.683b · Cited by 5,303
Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research
Pervin, L. A. (1992) · Cited by 4,543
A Systematic Method for Clinical Description and Classification of Personality Variants: A Proposal
Cloninger, C. R. (1987) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180093014 · Cited by 3,678
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 1980, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1052 · DOI
- 10.2466/PR0.69.7.1047-1057 · DOI
- Costa, 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual.
- Endicott, 1978, Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria (FH-RDC).
- Eysenck, 1975, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire.
- 10.1037/1040-3590.9.3.224 · DOI
- Goldberg, 1982, From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality., Vol. 1, 203
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.762 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.394 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.56.2.183 · DOI
- Robins, 1989, NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version III Revised.
- Robins, 1985, NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version III-A.
- 10.1037/0003-066X.45.5.612 · DOI
- Sher, 1987, Stress response dampening.
- 10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.92 · DOI
- Sher, 1999, Personality and alcoholism: Issues, methods, and etiological processes., 54
- 10.1037/0022-006X.56.2.189 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-843X.103.2.350 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.96 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART)
Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.8.2.75 · Cited by 2,336
Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes
de Wit, H. (2009) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x · Cited by 1,415
Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement
Dalley, J. W., Fryer, T. D., Brichard, L., Robinson, E. S. J., Theobald, D. E. H., Lääne, K., Peña, Y., Murphy, E. R., Shah, Y., Probst, K., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137073 · Cited by 1,188
High Impulsivity Predicts the Switch to Compulsive Cocaine-Taking
Belin, D., Mar, A. C., Dalley, J. W., Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158136 · Cited by 989
The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders
Dawe, S., & Loxton, N. J. (2004) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.007 · Cited by 944
“First, there are a number of cross-sectional studies in which substance misusers (typically of alcohol) have been compared to non-clinical comparison groups with a consistent finding of higher levels of impulsivity and novelty-seeking in the former compared with those in the latter group [27–30].”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Sher, K. J., Bartholow, B. D., & Wood, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 818-829
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W1991864809
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R37 AA7231, P50AA011998, P50 AA 11998, R37AA007231)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- personality traits, substance use disorders, substance abuse, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, impulsivity, sensation seeking, behavioral disinhibition, prospective prediction, autoregressive effects
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk-Taking, Sensitivity and Specificity, Logistic Models, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review