CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 334Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative outcomes for individual cognitive-behavior therapy, supportive-expressive group psychotherapy, and sertraline for the treatment of depression in multiple sclerosis.

Mohr, David C., Boudewyn, Arne C., Goodkin, Donald E., Bostrom, Alan, Epstein, Lucy·2001·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.69.6.942
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of 3 16-week treatments for depression in 63 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and major depressive disorder (MDD): individual cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), supportive-expressive group therapy (SEG). and the antidepressant sertraline. Significant reductions were seen from pre- to posttreatment in all measures of depression. Intent-to-treat and completers analyses using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; A. T. Beck, C. H. Ward. M. Medelson. J. Mock, & J. Erbaugh, 1961) and MDD diagnosis found that CBT and sertraline were more effective than SEG at reducing depression. These results were largely supported by the BDI-18, which eliminates BDI items confounded with MS. However, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (M. Hamilton, 1960) did not show consistent differences between treatments. Reasons for this inconsistency are discussed. These findings suggest that CBT or sertraline is more likely to be effective in treating MDD in MS compared with supportive group treatments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.69.6.942

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Classen, 1993, Brief supportive-expressive group therapy for women with primary breast cancer: A treatment manual.
  2. Cohen-Cole, 1987, Diagnostic assessment of depression in the medically ill., 23
  3. 10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.285 · DOI
  4. Mohr, 1998, Multiple sclerosis., 313
  5. 10.1093/clipsy/6.1.1 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.356 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0278-6133.18.4.383 · DOI
  8. Smith, 1982, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) manual (revised).
  9. Spiegel, 2000, Group psychotherapy for cancer patients.
  10. 10.1037/0022-006X.54.3.381 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wechsler, 1987, Wechsler Memory Scale--Revised manual.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 334

Related

Metadata

Authors
Mohr, D. C., Boudewyn, A. C., Goodkin, D. E., Bostrom, A., & Epstein, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of California Office of the President (US)
ORCID
Mohr, David C.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2001
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
942-949
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.69.6.942
OpenAlex
W2028940268
Cited by
334
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
FWCI
13.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH59708, R01MH059708)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression, multiple sclerosis, major depressive disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, supportive-expressive group therapy, sertraline, antidepressant treatment, treatment efficacy comparison, Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Psychotherapy, Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review