CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Interactive Psychoeducational Intervention for Women at Risk of Developing an Eating Disorder.

Zabinski, Marion F., Wilfley, Denise E., Calfas, Karen J., Winzelberg, Andrew J., Taylor, C. Barr·2004·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.72.5.914
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study evaluated a synchronous Internet-delivered intervention (chat room) for improving eating habits and body image in college-age women at risk for developing an eating disorder. Sixty at-risk women (mean age = 18.9, SD = 2.4; 65.0% Caucasian, 19% Latino/Hispanic, 8% Asian/Pacific Islander, 3% African American, 5% other; mean body mass index = 25.6, SD = 5.7) were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 30) or control (n = 30) groups. Once a week for 8 weeks, participants used a private chat room for a 1-hr moderated discussion focused on improving body image and eating behaviors. Additional treatment components included psychoeducation, asynchronous support, homework, and summaries. Assessments were conducted at baseline, posttreatment, and 10 weeks after posttreatment. Participants indicated high satisfaction with the intervention mode. Intervention participants significantly reduced eating pathology and improved self-esteem over controls at follow-up. These findings suggest that synchronous, Internet-delivered programs are efficacious and have potential to reduce problematic attitudes and behaviors that may lead to eating disorders among college-age women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.72.5.914

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cash, 2002, The management of body image problems., 599
  2. Fairburn, 1993, The Eating Disorder Examination, 317

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zabinski, M. F., Wilfley, D. E., Calfas, K. J., Winzelberg, A. J., & Taylor, C. B.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2004-10
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
914-919
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.72.5.914
OpenAlex
W2087459520
Cited by
122
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
eating disorders, women at risk, psychoeducational intervention, online intervention, chat rooms, body image, dietary habits, self-esteem, female university students, eating pathology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Education, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Health Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review