Cited by 467Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Changing toddlers' and preschoolers' attachment classifications: the Circle of Security intervention

Hoffman, Kent T., Marvin, Robert S., Cooper, Glen, Powell, Bert·2006·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The Circle of Security intervention uses a group treatment modality to provide parent education and psychotherapy that is based on attachment theory. The purpose of this study was to track changes in children's attachment classifications pre- and immediately postintervention. Participants were 65 toddler- or preschooler- caregiver dyads recruited from Head Start and Early Head Start programs. As predicted, there were significant within-subject changes from disorganized to organized attachment classifications, with a majority changing to the secure classification. In addition, only 1 of the 13 preintervention securely attached children shifted to an insecure classification. Results suggest that the Circle of Security protocol is a promising intervention for the reduction of disorganized and insecure attachment in high-risk toddlers and preschoolers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.74.6.1017

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific intervention programs including the Circle of Security, Triple P, Video Interaction for Promoting Positive Parenting Programme, and Mom Power have been validated according to randomized clinical trial approaches.

    “Specific intervention programs including the Circle of Security (Hoffman et al., 2006; Powell et al., 2014), Triple P (Positive Parenting Program) (Sanders et al., 2014), Video Interaction for Promoting Positive Parenting Programme (Van Zeijl et al., 2006), and Mom Power (Muzik et al., 2015), have been validated according to randomized clinical trial approaches.”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Hoffman et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, K. T., Marvin, R. S., Cooper, G., & Powell, B.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2006-12
Volume
74
Issue
6
Pages
1017-1026
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2112973080
Cited by
467
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • US Department of Health and Human Services (90YF0018; 90YD0108)
  • FHL Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attachment classification, disorganized attachment, insecure attachment, secure attachment, toddlers, preschool children, parent education, group therapy, caregiver-child dyads, early childhood intervention, Head Start, Early Head Start, vulnerable children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Preschool, Education, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Assessment, Psychotherapy, Group, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Early Intervention, Educational, Reactive Attachment Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review