Cited by 551Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reducing relapse and recurrence in unipolar depression: a comparative meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy’s effects

Open access
Vittengl, Jeffrey R., Clark, Lee Anna, Dunn, Todd W., Jarrett, Robin B.·2007·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Relapse and recurrence following response to acute-phase treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) are prevalent and costly. In a meta-analysis of 28 studies including 1,880 adults, the authors reviewed the world's published literature on cognitive-behavioral therapies (CT) aimed at preventing relapse-recurrence in MDD. Results indicate that after discontinuation of acute-phase treatment, many responders to CT relapse-recur (29% within 1 year and 54% within 2 years). These rates appear comparable to those associated with other depression-specific psychotherapies but lower than those associated with pharmacotherapy. Among acute-phase treatment responders, continuation-phase CT reduced relapse-recurrence compared with assessment only at the end of continuation treatment (21% reduction) and at follow-up (29% reduction). Continuation-phase CT also reduced relapse-recurrence compared with other active continuation treatments at the end of continuation treatment (12% reduction) and at follow-up (14% reduction). The authors discuss implications for research and patient care and suggest directions, with methodological refinements, for future studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.75.3.475

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–551 of 551

Metadata

Authors
Vittengl, J. R., Clark, L. A., Dunn, T. W., & Jarrett, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Truman State University (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2007
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
475-488
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1981386178
Cited by
551
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 37
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-58397; MH-01571)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, relapse prevention, recurrence prevention, cognitive behavioral therapy, acute phase treatment, psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Humans, Recurrence, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review