Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity.

Abstract

Students viewed a computer animation depicting the process of lightning. In Experiment 1, they concurrently viewed on-screen text presented near the animation or far from the animation, or concurrently listened to a narration. In Experiment 2, they concurrently viewed on-screen text or listened to a narration, viewed on-screen text following or preceding the animation, or listened to a narration following or preceding the animation. Learning was measured by retention, transfer, and matching tests. Experiment 1 revealed a spatial-contiguity effect in which students learned better when visual and verbal materials were physically close. Both experiments revealed a modality effect in which students learned better when verbal input was presented auditorily as speech rather than visually as text. The results support 2 cognitive principles of multimedia learning. Technological advances have made possible the combina-tion and coordination of verbal presentation modes (such as narration and on-screen text) with nonverbal presentation modes (such as graphics, video, animations, and environmen-tal sounds) in just one device (the computer). These ad-vances include multimedia environments, where students can be introduced to causal models of complex systems by the use of computer-generated animations (Park & Hopkins, 1993). However, despite its power to facilitate learning, multimedia has been develo~ed on the basis of its technologi-.d cal capacity, and rarely is it used according to research-based principles (Kozma, 1991; Mayer, in press; Moore, Burton, & Myers, 1996). Instructional design of multimedia is still mostly based on the intuitive beliefs of designers rather than on empirical evidence (Park & Hannafin, 1994). The purpose of the present study is to contribute to multi-media learning theory by clarifying and testing two cogni-tive principles: the contiguity principle and the modality principle.

Cites (33)

1. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach
   Allan Paivio · 1986 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
2. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance
   Wickens, Christopher D., Hollands, Justin G., Banbury, Simon, Parasuraman, Raja · 2015 · Psychology Press eBooks
3. Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction
   Chandler, Paul, Sweller, John · 1991 · Cognition and Instruction
4. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
   2013 · Routledge eBooks
5. Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions?
   Mayer, Richard E. · 1997 · Educational Psychologist
6. Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn
   Sweller, John, Chandler, Paul · 1994 · Cognition and Instruction
7. Learning with Media
   Kozma, Robert B. · 1991 · Review of Educational Research
8. Attention and performance IV
   Sylvan Kornblum · 1973 · Academic Press eBooks
9. A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory.
   Mayer, Richard E., Moreno, Roxana · 1998 · Journal of Educational Psychology
10. The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra
    Sweller, John, Cooper, Graham A. · 1985 · Cognition and Instruction

Show all 33 references

Cited by (61)

1. Multimedia Learning
   Mayer, Richard E. · 2009
2. Multimedia Learning
   Mayer, Richard · 2020
3. Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning
   Mayer, Richard E., Moreno, Roxana · 2003 · Educational Psychologist
4. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review
   Coffield, F, Moseley, D, Hall, E, Ecclestone, K · 2004 · Newcastle University
5. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations
   Ainsworth, Shaaron · 2006 · Learning and Instruction

See all 1,527